★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
<del> perhaps not altogether good as in other places: but</del><lb/><del>be they good or bad makes as to this point but little difference.</del><lb/> <del>By what authority are they made <add>Good or bad <gap/></add> <gap/>By which ground</del><lb/><del><add><gap/> of these <gap/></add></del><del>can the very best of them be said to be legal?</del> <del>Cases</del> Cases<lb/><add>more <gap/> . Cases</add> may be put without number. <del>An</del> A convict whose<lb/>term is expired, attempts <add>and <gap/></add> to get on board a ship he has<lb/>agreed with for his passage: the Governor <del>attem</del> undervenes<lb/> to prevent him: a struggle insues: the Governor<lb/>is killed: would <add>Is</add> <add>is not this</add> this be murder, <add>or manslaughter</add> in the Convict? The<lb/>Convict is killed: <del>would</del> <add>is</add> <del><add>is not this</add></del> not this <del>be</del> murder <add>or manslaughter</add> in the Governor?<lb/> <add>In the first <del>ca the</del> event the</add> <del>The</del> self-defending Convict, though legally innocent<lb/>would be <gap/> of them without much difficulty ; but in the other <lb/> where would be the defense of the Governor against <del>in England</del> <hi rend="underline">appeal</hi> in England?<lb/></del><note>This thing not murder, if on the part of the quondam Convict; - this thing murder if on the part of the Governor.</note> <p>The Governor, with or without what would <add>in England</add> be thought <del><gap/></del><lb/>sufficient ground - makes a regulation, ordering all persons<lb/>in the Colony, having fire arms to give them up, <del>to</del> in<lb/><add>places and to</add> person <del>named</del> therein named. Some having fire-arms<lb/> | <del> perhaps not altogether good as in other places: but</del><lb/><del>be they good or bad makes as to this point but little difference.</del><lb/> <del>By what authority are they made <add>Good or bad <gap/></add> <gap/>By which ground</del><lb/><del><add><gap/> of these <gap/></add></del><del>can the very best of them be said to be legal?</del> <del>Cases</del> Cases<lb/><add>more <gap/> . Cases</add> may be put without number. <del>An</del> A convict whose<lb/>term is expired, attempts <add>and <gap/></add> to get on board a ship he has<lb/>agreed with for his passage: the Governor <del>attem</del> undervenes<lb/> to prevent him: a struggle insues: the Governor<lb/>is killed: would <add>Is</add> <add>is not this</add> this be murder, <add>or manslaughter</add> in the Convict? The<lb/>Convict is killed: <del>would</del> <add>is</add> <del><add>is not this</add></del> not this <del>be</del> murder <add>or manslaughter</add> in the Governor?<lb/> <add>In the first <del>ca the</del> event the</add> <del>The</del> self-defending Convict, though legally innocent<lb/>would be <gap/> of them without much difficulty ; but in the other <lb/> where would be the defense of the Governor against <del>in England</del> <hi rend="underline">appeal</hi> in England?<lb/></del><note>This thing not murder, if on the part of the quondam Convict; - this thing murder if on the part of the Governor.</note> <p>The Governor, with or without what would <add>in England</add> be thought <del><gap/></del><lb/>sufficient ground - makes a regulation, ordering all persons<lb/>in the Colony, having fire arms to give them up, <del>to</del> in<lb/><add>places and to</add> person <del>named</del> therein named. Some having fire-arms<lb/> | ||
<del><gap/> to them before</del><add><del>that had been</del> such of the things</add> give them up accordingly, <del>as they</del><lb/><del>ought to do,</del> or (as <del>happe in a case that</del> happened <del>in</del><lb/><del><gap/></del> to 200 out of 250<note>Collins p. 131.</note> ) omitt to give them up; others<lb/>having fire-arms of their own <del>bought</del> <add>(lawfully purchased</add> with their own<lb/><del>money - <gap/></del> <add>money - suppose of one of the many foreign ships that have touched there)</add> not only omitt to give them up but<lb/>refuse it. The Governor attempts to seise them. - <del>what</del> <add>Where</add><lb/><del><gap/></del>is his right of doing so? - <del>The</del> where. <del>At the same time,</del> <add>Yet, in</add> <del>in respect of security -</del> <add>point of security, <del>to an object</del></add> in a settlement so circumstanced<lb/><del>does it not</del> what <del>difference does it make</del> <add>matters it</add> when that the<add>y</add> <del>cases</del><lb/><del>thus demanded to <gap/></del> are the <add>thing</add> <del>property of the Crown</del>, or a <lb/>man's own? Will a musquet, in the hand of an United<lb/>Irishman, do <add>any the</add> less mischief, for having been <add>lawfully</add> bought, <del>with his</del><lb/>than if it had been stolen or embezzled? <del><gap/></del>Has all the same: <note>If the deficiency of power is not yet <gap/> enough support the occasion to the struggle to have been the enforcements of the Ordinance N<hi rend="superscript">o</hi> 3 or 5, for security against <gap/></note><lb/><note>This</note> | <del><gap/> to them before</del><add><del>that had been</del> such of the things</add> give them up accordingly, <del>as they</del><lb/><del>ought to do,</del> or (as <del>happe in a case that</del> happened <del>in</del><lb/><del><gap/></del> to 200 out of 250<note>Collins p. 131.</note> ) omitt to give them up; others<lb/>having fire-arms of their own <del>bought</del> <add>(lawfully purchased</add> with their own<lb/><del>money - <gap/></del> <add>money - suppose of one of the many foreign ships that have touched there)</add> not only omitt to give them up but<lb/>refuse it. The Governor attempts to seise them. - <del>what</del> <add>Where</add><lb/><del><gap/></del>is his right of doing so? - <del>The</del> where. <del>At the same time,</del> <add>Yet, in</add> <del>in respect of security -</del> <add>point of security, <del>to an object</del></add> in a settlement so circumstanced<lb/><del>does it not</del> what <del>difference does it make</del> <add>matters it</add> when that the<add>y</add> <del>cases</del><lb/><del>thus demanded to <gap/></del> are the <add>thing</add> <del>property of the Crown</del>, or a <lb/>man's own? Will a musquet, in the hand of an United<lb/>Irishman, do <add>any the</add> less mischief, for having been <add>lawfully</add> bought, <del>with his</del><lb/>than if it had been stolen or embezzled? <del><gap/></del>Has all the same: <note>If the deficiency of power is not yet <gap/> enough support the occasion to the struggle to have been the enforcements of the Ordinance N<hi rend="superscript">o</hi> 3 or 5, for security against <gap/></note><lb/><note>This</note> | ||
<del><gap/></p> | <del><gap/></del></p> | ||
ConvictAn event — such as may be happens at any time —
would however upon be sufficient at any time to lay open the
Regulation af upon regulation have been issued by Governor
upon Governor - by for the greater part good I suppose has
those are
perhaps not altogether good as in other places: but
be they good or bad makes as to this point but little difference.
By what authority are they made Good or bad By which ground
of these can the very best of them be said to be legal? Cases Cases
more . Cases may be put without number. An A convict whose
term is expired, attempts and to get on board a ship he has
agreed with for his passage: the Governor attem undervenes
to prevent him: a struggle insues: the Governor
is killed: would Is is not this this be murder, or manslaughter in the Convict? The
Convict is killed: would is is not this not this be murder or manslaughter in the Governor?
In the first ca the event the The self-defending Convict, though legally innocent
would be of them without much difficulty ; but in the other
where would be the defense of the Governor against in England appeal in England?
This thing not murder, if on the part of the quondam Convict; - this thing murder if on the part of the Governor.
The Governor, with or without what would in England be thought
sufficient ground - makes a regulation, ordering all persons
in the Colony, having fire arms to give them up, to in
places and to person named therein named. Some having fire-arms
to them beforethat had been such of the things give them up accordingly, as they
ought to do, or (as happe in a case that happened in
to 200 out of 250Collins p. 131. ) omitt to give them up; others
having fire-arms of their own bought (lawfully purchased with their own
money - money - suppose of one of the many foreign ships that have touched there) not only omitt to give them up but
refuse it. The Governor attempts to seise them. - what Where
is his right of doing so? - The where. At the same time, Yet, in in respect of security - point of security, to an object in a settlement so circumstanced
does it not what difference does it make matters it when that they cases
thus demanded to are the thing property of the Crown, or a
man's own? Will a musquet, in the hand of an United
Irishman, do any the less mischief, for having been lawfully bought, with his
than if it had been stolen or embezzled? Has all the same: If the deficiency of power is not yet enough support the occasion to the struggle to have been the enforcements of the Ordinance No 3 or 5, for security against
This
|
Identifier: | JB/116/220/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 116. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1802-06-12 |
2, 12 |
||
|
116 |
panopticon versus new south wales |
||
|
220 |
n. s. wales |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
d3 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
[[watermarks::[monogram] 1800]] |
||
|
1800 |
|||
|
37753 |
|||
