JB/117/045/004: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/117/045/004: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
Petergh (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p><note><!-- note in pencil -->8<lb/>
English Architect<lb/>
promises<lb/>
<unclear>necessary</unclear></note><lb/>
<!-- Paragraph ruled off top and bottom and crossed through -->It seems therefore that the plan of having an<lb/>
English architect subjects you <del>to a certain increase</del><lb/>
<del>of <sic>expence</sic></del> for a certainty to an <add><del>a less</del></add> increase of <sic>expence</sic><lb/>
perhaps not less than the utmost you have to apprehend<lb/>
from <del>an</del> <add>any</add> overcharge that may be made by<lb/>
an Irish one. The <del>person</del> <add>man</add> into whose hands it should<lb/>
naturally fall is an eligible man: be it so: but is there<lb/>
no alternative but taking that <unclear>man</unclear> <gap/> from England?</p> 


<note><!-- note in pencil -->9.<lb/>
2 Remedy<lb/>
Publication<lb/>
of accounts</note><lb/>When the temptation to profusion is thus cut<lb/>
off there remains the danger of peculation by the<lb/>
principal <del>contractors</del> Architects conniving at overcharges on<lb/>
the part of the workmen and sharing with them<lb/>
in the profit. Against this <del>I see no other remedy</del> <add>you have two remedies</add>.<lb/>
<del>than</del> <add>One the obvious one of</add> the previous assurance of <del>the</del> <add>a</add> publication<lb/>
of the accounts.




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 13:01, 16 March 2014

Click Here To Edit

8
English Architect
promises
necessary

It seems therefore that the plan of having an
English architect subjects you to a certain increase
of expence for a certainty to an a less increase of expence
perhaps not less than the utmost you have to apprehend
from an any overcharge that may be made by
an Irish one. The person man into whose hands it should
naturally fall is an eligible man: be it so: but is there
no alternative but taking that man from England?

9.
2 Remedy
Publication
of accounts

When the temptation to profusion is thus cut
off there remains the danger of peculation by the
principal contractors Architects conniving at overcharges on
the part of the workmen and sharing with them
in the profit. Against this I see no other remedy you have two remedies.
than One the obvious one of the previous assurance of the a publication
of the accounts.



Identifier: | JB/117/045/004"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 117.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

5-7

Box

117

Main Headings

panopticon

Folio number

045a"a" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 45.

Info in main headings field

Image

004

Titles

Category

correspondence

Number of Pages

2

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f3 / f4

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[britannia with shield emblem]]]

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

draft of letter 714, vol. 4

ID Number

38662

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in