★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
ValerieWallace (talk | contribs) Forum:Admin, Forum:Mod, awardsmanage, Bureaucrats, giftadmin, staff, Administrators 193 edits No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
'' | Turnp. A. Unsteadiness of expression proved bad.<lb/> | ||
Lax equivocalitar <del>the proof of this is as follows</del> is demonstrated from <del><gap/></del> <gap/> conversations<lb/> | |||
The two causes are supposed to be of the same effect & <gap/> to the same end, my reading is<add><unclear>reading of</unclear></add><lb/> | |||
substantially by the same means.<lb/> | |||
Either then the import<add><gap/></add> of the <gap/> of <gap/>,<lb/> | |||
and <unclear>on</unclear> each is <unclear>specifically</unclear> the same or it is<lb/> | |||
<!-- untranscribed left margin comment begins here --> | |||
different<lb/> | |||
if it be precisely the same, then can no reason<lb/> | |||
to <gap?> and I <gap/> be used why one ought<add>should</add> <hi rend='underline'>not</hi> sense for both - if<lb/> | |||
the interests if conformity are a reason why it <hi rend='underline'>should</hi>,<lb/> | |||
& there is a difference, then either each is equally <gap/><add>proper</add> to the effect required, or one is more<lb/> | |||
<gap/> than the other.<lb/> | |||
If the former be.<add>each be equally <gap/></add> <gap/> this <gap/>, then it is <unclear>shown</unclear> no<lb/> | |||
reason against others being used for the <gap/> of<lb/> | |||
<unclear>there</unclear> is the reason for it that has been <unclear>encountered</unclear><lb/> | |||
above<lb/> | |||
If one is more so than the other, then it then<lb/> | |||
double reason <del>for</del> why that should be as <gap/><lb/> | |||
<unclear>losely</unclear> | |||
1<hi rend='superscript'>st</hi> <gap/> of its <add><gap/></add> <gap/> proper as by the <gap/><lb/> | |||
2<hi rend='superscript'>nd</hi> <gap/> of conformity, as before<lb/> | |||
Turnp. A. Unsteadiness of expression proved bad.
Lax equivocalitar the proof of this is as follows is demonstrated from conversations
The two causes are supposed to be of the same effect & to the same end, my reading isreading of
substantially by the same means.
Either then the import of the of ,
and on each is specifically the same or it is
different
if it be precisely the same, then can no reason
to <gap?> and I be used why one oughtshould not sense for both - if
the interests if conformity are a reason why it should,
& there is a difference, then either each is equally proper to the effect required, or one is more
than the other.
If the former be.each be equally this , then it is shown no
reason against others being used for the of
there is the reason for it that has been encountered
above
If one is more so than the other, then it then
double reason for why that should be as
losely
1st of its proper as by the
2nd of conformity, as before
|
Identifier: | JB/095/025/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 95. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
095 |
|||
|
025 |
turnp. a. unsteadiness of expression proved bad |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
2 |
||
|
recto |
|||
|
jeremy bentham |
|||
|
30911 |
|||
