JB/073/086/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/073/086/001: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/073/086/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/073/086/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<head>1</head> <head>ADULTERY &#x2014; Of Wife why disgraceful to the Husband</head>  It is a common affectation among popular moralists<lb/> to <unclear>treat</unclear> it as an explicable<!-- lapse for "inexplicable"? --> problem,<lb/> why <add>it is that</add> the infidelity of the <del><gap/></del> Wife should<lb/> reflect, <add>is apt to reflect</add> <add>when the <!-- symbols (circles?) around "the"--></add><note>when the Gallant, at least in certain countries &amp; in a certain <gap/>, even rears his head the higher</note> commonly a degree of disgrace upon the <add>injured</add> Husband: as if the <del><gap/>been</del> <add><gap/><gap/></add> to regard <lb/> the matter in that light were a mere<lb/> caprice, which bore no analogy to the general<lb/> tenor of human sentiments, nor had any connection<lb/> with the general <unclear>principles</unclear> of Human<lb/> Nature &#x2014;<note>was inexplicable <gap/> the General Theory of Human nature</note> It is however easily enough accounted<lb/> for by one who <add><del><gap/></del></add> has chosen to <unclear>survey</unclear> a <lb/> a subject Impartially on both Sides, without<lb/>permitting himself that license which is afflamed <lb/> by <del><gap/>of <gap/> who </del><add>the <unclear>hord</unclear> of <gap/>.</add> <del><gap/>of <gap/></del> <unclear>wife</unclear> <add>the <unclear>kind</unclear> of <unclear>reasons</unclear> for <gap/> their</add> eyes against <lb/> what may be alledged in <sic>favor</sic> of what is <unclear>or</unclear> <lb/> <unclear>passes</unclear> for illaudable, &amp; of combating vice <lb/> as it were with poisoned weapons.<lb/> <sic>there</sic> are they <add>who</add> consider every <del>vice</del><add>vicious habit of <gap/> <add>or of action</add></add> in its <pb/><head>2</head> turn as somewhat strange, &amp; inconceivable &amp; unnatural,<lb/> &amp; <del>from</del> by the <gap/> which in their<lb/> imagination a <hi rend='underline'>Cause</hi> carries to a <hi rend='underline'>reason</hi>, <del><gap/></del><lb/> led to <unclear>their</unclear> studying to represent it as without<lb/> a cause, they <del><unclear>present</unclear></del> <add>shut out</add> that light which<lb/><add><del><gap/>discovery</del><add>has knowledge</add> of its cause
<head>1</head> <head>ADULTERY &#x2014; Of Wife why disgraceful to the Husband</head>  It is a common affectation among popular moralists<lb/> to <unclear>treat</unclear> it as an explicable <!-- lapse for "inexplicable"? --> problem,<lb/> why <add>it is that</add> the infidelity of the <del><gap/></del> Wife should<lb/> reflect, <add>is apt to reflect</add> <add>when the <!-- symbols (circles?) around "the"--></add><note>when the Gallant, at least in certain countries &amp; in a certain <gap/>, even rears his head the higher</note> commonly a degree of disgrace upon the <add>injured</add> Husband: as if the <del><gap/>been</del> <add><gap/><gap/></add> to regard <lb/> the matter in that light were a mere<lb/> caprice, which bore no analogy to the general<lb/> tenor of human sentiments, nor had any connection<lb/> with the general <unclear>principles</unclear> of Human<lb/> Nature &#x2014;<note>was inexplicable <gap/> the General Theory of Human nature</note> It is however easily enough accounted<lb/> for by one who <add><del><gap/></del></add> has chosen to <unclear>survey</unclear> a <lb/> a subject Impartially on both Sides, without<lb/>permitting himself that license which is afflamed <lb/> by <del> <gap/> of <gap/> who </del> <add>the <unclear>hord</unclear> of <gap/> </add> <del><gap/>of <gap/></del> <unclear>wife</unclear> <add>the <unclear>kind</unclear> of <unclear>reasons</unclear> for <gap/> their</add> eyes against <lb/> what may be alledged in <sic>favor</sic> of what is <unclear>or</unclear> <lb/> <unclear>passes</unclear> for illaudable, &amp; of combating vice <lb/> as it were with poisoned weapons.<lb/> <sic>there</sic> are they <add>who</add> consider every <del>vice</del><add>vicious habit of <gap/> <add>or of action</add></add> in its <pb/><head>2</head> turn as somewhat strange, &amp; inconceivable &amp; unnatural,<lb/> &amp; <del>from</del> by the <gap/> which in their<lb/> imagination a <hi rend='underline'>Cause</hi> carries to a <hi rend='underline'>reason</hi>, <del><gap/></del><lb/> led to <unclear>their</unclear> studying to represent it as without<lb/> a cause, they <del><unclear>present</unclear></del> <add>shut out</add> that light which<lb/><add><del><gap/>discovery</del><add>has knowledge</add> of its cause
</add> would <del>be</del> cast upon the subject, &amp; intercept<lb/> the <del>method</del> <add>means</add>, <add><gap/><gap/>of<gap/><gap/></add>, which that knowledge would afford<lb/> of combating it with advantage. &#x2014; a conduct <lb/> this, which resembles that of <del>those</del> the vulgar, who <lb/> when a <unclear>hord</unclear> of noxious insects visits the earth<lb/> <del>th</del> instead of applying themselves to the investigation <lb/> of its nature and its origination <add><note>instead of setting themselves down calmly to studying of its history &amp; its properties </note>in order to <unclear>Devise</unclear></add> <unclear>what</unclear> methods may<lb/> be discovered for destroying it, <add><gap/><gap/></add> join together in<lb/> regarding it as an <add><gap/></add> inexplicable and <gap/><lb/> instrument of vengeance in the hand of Heaven.<lb/><p>paragraph</p> The circumstances which may lead a woman<lb/> into this guilt <del>are</del><add><gap/></add> reducible to these following<lb/> <del><gap/></del> on her part &#x2014; a <unclear>roving</unclear> &amp; libidinous <gap/>
</add> would <del>be</del> cast upon the subject, &amp; intercept<lb/> the <del>method</del> <add>means</add>, <add><gap/><gap/>of<gap/><gap/></add>, which that knowledge would afford<lb/> of combating it with advantage. &#x2014; a conduct <lb/> this, which resembles that of <del>those</del> the vulgar, who <lb/> when a <unclear>hord</unclear> of noxious insects visits the earth<lb/> <del>th</del> instead of applying themselves to the investigation <lb/> of its nature and its origination <add><note>instead of setting themselves down calmly to studying of its history &amp; its properties </note>in order to <unclear>Devise</unclear></add> <unclear>what</unclear> methods may<lb/> be discovered for destroying it, <add><gap/><gap/></add> join together in<lb/> regarding it as an <add><gap/></add> inexplicable and <gap/><lb/> instrument of vengeance in the hand of Heaven.<lb/><p>paragraph</p> The circumstances which may lead a woman<lb/> into this guilt <del>are</del><add><gap/></add> reducible to these following<lb/> <del><gap/></del> on her part &#x2014; a <unclear>roving</unclear> &amp; libidinous <gap/>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 19:46, 28 December 2010

Click Here To Edit 1 ADULTERY — Of Wife why disgraceful to the Husband It is a common affectation among popular moralists
to treat it as an explicable problem,
why it is that the infidelity of the Wife should
reflect, is apt to reflect when the when the Gallant, at least in certain countries & in a certain , even rears his head the higher commonly a degree of disgrace upon the injured Husband: as if the been to regard
the matter in that light were a mere
caprice, which bore no analogy to the general
tenor of human sentiments, nor had any connection
with the general principles of Human
Nature —was inexplicable the General Theory of Human nature It is however easily enough accounted
for by one who has chosen to survey a
a subject Impartially on both Sides, without
permitting himself that license which is afflamed
by of who the hord of of wife the kind of reasons for their eyes against
what may be alledged in favor of what is or
passes for illaudable, & of combating vice
as it were with poisoned weapons.
there are they who consider every vicevicious habit of <add>or of action</add> in its
---page break---
2 turn as somewhat strange, & inconceivable & unnatural,
& from by the which in their
imagination a Cause carries to a reason,
led to their studying to represent it as without
a cause, they present shut out that light which
discovery<add>has knowledge of its cause

</add> would be cast upon the subject, & intercept
the method means, of, which that knowledge would afford
of combating it with advantage. — a conduct
this, which resembles that of those the vulgar, who
when a hord of noxious insects visits the earth
th instead of applying themselves to the investigation
of its nature and its origination instead of setting themselves down calmly to studying of its history & its properties in order to Devise what methods may
be discovered for destroying it, join together in
regarding it as an inexplicable and
instrument of vengeance in the hand of Heaven.

paragraph

The circumstances which may lead a woman
into this guilt are reducible to these following
on her part — a roving & libidinous



Identifier: | JB/073/086/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 73.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

073

Main Headings

law in general

Folio number

086

Info in main headings field

adultery - of wife why disgraceful to the husband

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f1 / f2

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[lion with vryheyt motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

23926

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in