★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
have <del>one</del> one, or ten persons, or the whole <gap/><lb/> <gap/> in view: whether the operation of<lb/>what will be confined to a day, a, month, a<lb/>Year, or be extended to any number of Years<lb/> it is still a rule <del>and that therefore our<gap/></del> | have <del>one</del> one, or ten persons, or the whole <gap/><lb/> <gap/> in view: whether the operation of<lb/>what will be confined to a day, a, month, a<lb/>Year, or be extended to any number of Years<lb/> it is still a rule <del>and that therefore our<gap/></del> | ||
<add>of civil conduct, & therefore <del><gap/></del> a Law: /See Addenda a/</add><lb/> | <add>of civil conduct, & therefore <del><gap/></del> a Law: /See Addenda a/</add><lb/> | ||
<!-- begin large deleted section --> | |||
Farther,<del><gap/></del><add>though</add>the <del>benefit</del><add><gap/></add><add><gap/></add><add>benefit</add><gap/> a Law may, be confined to a single<lb/>person, yet it's directions extend to all, it's<gap/>may be<lb/><gap/> should have added some <gap/> to the <lb/> member of the community to abstain from <del><add>our Author</add></del> the field; and threatens<lb/> | Farther,<del><gap/></del><add>though</add>the <del>benefit</del><add><gap/></add><add><gap/></add><add>benefit</add><gap/> a Law may, be confined to a single<lb/>person, yet it's directions extend to all, it's<gap/>may be<lb/><gap/> should have added some <gap/> to the <lb/> member of the community to abstain from <del><add>our Author</add></del> the field; and threatens<lb/> | ||
<!-- end large deleted section (incomplete) --> | |||
But says our Author, a particular <gap/> of <lb/> | |||
"the legislature to confiscate the goods of <gap/><lb/>"and to <unclear>attain</unclear> him of high treason does not <lb/>"enter into the idea of any <gap/> law;"<lb/>I think so too: But I question different reason from that <gap/><lb/> | |||
by out Author. His reason is; "Because<lb/><del>and that because</del><note>2. is the <gap/>? Were a man to receive, harbor & abet this<lb/>same <gap/> often he was the operation of this act is<gap/>, would the <gap/> of <unclear>heart</unclear><lb/>be so thoroughly spent on the person of <gap/> as not to have reserved a stroke or two for his friend</note> the operation of this act is<lb/> | |||
spent upon <gap/> only,<note>2. is the <gap/>? Were a man to receive, harbor & abet this<lb/>same <gap/> often he was the operation of this act is<gap/>, would the <gap/> of <unclear>heart</unclear><lb/>be so thoroughly spent on the person of <gap/> as not to have reserved a stroke or two for his friend</note> and has no relation<lb/>to | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | ||
To be omitted
have one one, or ten persons, or the whole
in view: whether the operation of
what will be confined to a day, a, month, a
Year, or be extended to any number of Years
it is still a rule and that therefore our
of civil conduct, & therefore a Law: /See Addenda a/
Farther,thoughthe benefitbenefit a Law may, be confined to a single
person, yet it's directions extend to all, it'smay be
should have added some to the
member of the community to abstain from our Author the field; and threatens
But says our Author, a particular of
"the legislature to confiscate the goods of
"and to attain him of high treason does not
"enter into the idea of any law;"
I think so too: But I question different reason from that
by out Author. His reason is; "Because
and that because2. is the ? Were a man to receive, harbor & abet this
same often he was the operation of this act is, would the of heart
be so thoroughly spent on the person of as not to have reserved a stroke or two for his friend the operation of this act is
spent upon only,2. is the ? Were a man to receive, harbor & abet this
same often he was the operation of this act is, would the of heart
be so thoroughly spent on the person of as not to have reserved a stroke or two for his friend and has no relation
to
|
Identifier: | JB/096/029/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 96. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
096 |
comment on the commentaries |
||
|
029 |
|||
|
001 |
section vi / our author's account of municipal law |
||
|
collectanea |
2 |
||
|
recto |
c74 / c75 |
||
|
168 |
gr |
||
|
[[notes_public::"to be copied" [note not in bentham's hand]]] |
31033 |
||
