JB/096/029/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/096/029/001: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<head>To be omitted</head>


have <del>one</del> one, or ten persons, or the whole <gap/><lb/> <gap/> in view: whether the operation of<lb/>what will be confined to a day, a, month, a<lb/>Year, or be extended to any number of Years<lb/> it is still a rule <del>and that therefore our<gap/></del>
<p><note>To be omitted</note>
<add>of civil conduct, &amp; therefore <del><gap/></del> a Law: /See Addenda a/</add><lb/>
 
have <del>one</del> one, or ten persons, or the whole <gap/>
<lb/>
<gap/> in view: whether the operation of
<lb/>
what will be confined to a day, a, month, a
<lb/>
Year, or be extended to any number of Years
<lb/>
it is still a rule <del>and that therefore our<gap/></del>
<add>of civil conduct, &amp; therefore <del><gap/></del> a Law: /See Addenda a/</add>
<lb/>


<!-- begin large deleted section -->
<!-- begin large deleted section -->
Farther,<del><gap/></del><add>though</add>the <del>benefit</del><add><gap/></add><add><gap/></add><add>benefit</add><gap/> a Law may, be confined to a single<lb/>person, yet it's directions extend to all, it's penalties may be<lb/><gap/> should have added some <gap/> to the<lb/> affect all. The Law which gives the field to Titius, directs every<lb/> member of the community to abstain from <del><add>our Author</add></del> the field; and threatens<lb/><gap\>rule yet I shall not avail with <gap\> every member with <gap\>
Farther,<del><gap/></del><add>though</add>the <del>benefit</del><add><gap/></add><add><gap/></add><add>benefit</add><gap/> a Law may, be confined to a single
<lb/>
person, yet it's directions extend to all, it's penalties may be
<lb/>
<gap/> should have added some <gap/> to the
<lb/>
affect all. The Law which gives the field to Titius, directs every
<lb/>
member of the community to abstain from <del><add>our Author</add></del> the field; and threatens<lb/><gap\>rule yet I shall not avail with <gap\> every member with <gap\>
<!-- end large deleted section (incomplete) -->
<!-- end large deleted section (incomplete) -->


But says our Author, a particular <gap/> of <lb/>
But says our Author, a particular <gap/> of
"the legislature to confiscate the goods of Titius<lb/>"and to <unclear>attain</unclear> him of high treason does not <lb/>"enter into the idea of any <gap/> law;"<lb/>I think so too: But I question different reason from that <gap/><lb/>
<lb/>
by out Author. His reason is; "Because<lb/><del>and that because</del><note>2. is the <gap/>? Were a man to receive, harbor &amp; abet this<lb/>same <gap/> often he was the operation of this act is<gap/>, would the <gap/> of <unclear>heart</unclear><lb/>be so thoroughly spent on the person of <gap/> as not to have reserved a stroke or two for his friend</note> the operation of this act is<lb/>
"the legislature to confiscate the goods of Titius
spent upon Titius only,<note>2. is the <gap/>? Were a man to receive, harbor &amp; abet this<lb/>same <gap/> often he was the operation of this act is<gap/>, would the <gap/> of <unclear>heart</unclear><lb/>be so thoroughly spent on the person of Titius as not to have reserved a stroke or two for his friend</note> and has no relation<lb/>to  
<lb/>
"and to <unclear>attain</unclear> him of high treason does not
<lb/>
"enter into the idea of any <gap/> law;"
<lb/>
I think so too: But I question different reason from that <gap/>
<lb/>
by out Author. His reason is; "Because
<lb/>
<del>and that because</del><note>2. is the <gap/>? Were a man to receive, harbor &amp; abet this
<lb/>
same <gap/> often he was the operation of this act is<gap/>, would the <gap/> of <unclear>heart</unclear><lb/>be so thoroughly spent on the person of <gap/> as not to have reserved a stroke or two for his friend</note> the operation of this act is
<lb/>
spent upon Titius only,<note>2. is the <gap/>? Were a man to receive, harbor &amp; abet this
<lb/>
same <gap/> often he was the operation of this act is<gap/>, would the <gap/> of <unclear>heart</unclear>
<lb/>
be so thoroughly spent on the person of Titius as not to have reserved a stroke or two for his friend</note> and has no relation
<lb/>
to  
 
<head>75</head>
 
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 01:34, 30 December 2010

Click Here To Edit


To be omitted have one one, or ten persons, or the whole
in view: whether the operation of
what will be confined to a day, a, month, a
Year, or be extended to any number of Years
it is still a rule and that therefore our of civil conduct, & therefore a Law: /See Addenda a/
Farther,thoughthe benefitbenefit a Law may, be confined to a single
person, yet it's directions extend to all, it's penalties may be
should have added some to the
affect all. The Law which gives the field to Titius, directs every
member of the community to abstain from our Author the field; and threatens
<gap\>rule yet I shall not avail with <gap\> every member with <gap\> But says our Author, a particular of
"the legislature to confiscate the goods of Titius
"and to attain him of high treason does not
"enter into the idea of any law;"
I think so too: But I question different reason from that
by out Author. His reason is; "Because
and that because2. is the ? Were a man to receive, harbor & abet this
same often he was the operation of this act is, would the of heart
be so thoroughly spent on the person of as not to have reserved a stroke or two for his friend
the operation of this act is
spent upon Titius only,2. is the ? Were a man to receive, harbor & abet this
same often he was the operation of this act is, would the of heart
be so thoroughly spent on the person of Titius as not to have reserved a stroke or two for his friend
and has no relation
to 75

Identifier: | JB/096/029/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 96.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

096

Main Headings

comment on the commentaries

Folio number

029

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

section vi / our author's account of municipal law

Category

collectanea

Number of Pages

2

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c74 / c75

Penner

168

Watermarks

gr

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

[[notes_public::"to be copied" [note not in bentham's hand]]]

ID Number

31033

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in