★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
Auto loaded |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''[{{fullurl:JB/096/238/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | '''[{{fullurl:JB/096/238/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
under construction ... | |||
<head>NOTORIETY EXCLUSION</head> | |||
<p>If I were compelled to choose, & by that choice enabled to decide, the Courts of <unclear>Westminster</unclear> | |||
<lb/> | |||
Hall and all the inferior Courts of Judicature should be shut up, <note>Exactly as <add>in the light in which</add> the Houses of Parliament deal at this day <del>with</del> <add>meet</add> the people, did the Sovereign in the <add>last</add> Century but one treat them, [at least the Commons <add>one of them <gap/></add> Matters of State were too high for them, was the language of a wise but <unclear>superious</unclear> Queen If the new members of <gap/> house are <add>far</add> wiser for the most part than those who would become their Auditor, the <del>case</del> <add>disparity</add> perhaps was not <add>less</add> different between that Sovereign and the then members of <unclear>low</unclear> Houses — but as Wisdom tho' a great is not the sole requisite in a Legislature</note> but the Courts | |||
<lb/> | |||
of Parliament should be open — why? because to the transactions of those inferior Courts | |||
<lb/> | |||
there would be still a check, namely the other superior ones, — But from these the | |||
<lb/> | |||
check <add><unclear><sic>centenel</sic></unclear></add> of public opinion being taken away, the only one of which by their nature they are | |||
<lb/> | |||
<gap/>, they remain without <unclear>control</unclear>. | |||
<lb/></p> | |||
<p>I know it will be presently observed, that when the one <unclear><del>House</del></unclear> <add>Court</add> of Legislature acts | |||
<lb/> | |||
in it's capacity of a Court of Judicator, it is then open | |||
<lb/></p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} |
under construction ...
NOTORIETY EXCLUSION
If I were compelled to choose, & by that choice enabled to decide, the Courts of Westminster
Hall and all the inferior Courts of Judicature should be shut up, Exactly as in the light in which the Houses of Parliament deal at this day with meet the people, did the Sovereign in the last Century but one treat them, [at least the Commons one of them Matters of State were too high for them, was the language of a wise but superious Queen If the new members of house are far wiser for the most part than those who would become their Auditor, the case disparity perhaps was not less different between that Sovereign and the then members of low Houses — but as Wisdom tho' a great is not the sole requisite in a Legislature but the Courts
of Parliament should be open — why? because to the transactions of those inferior Courts
there would be still a check, namely the other superior ones, — But from these the
check centenel of public opinion being taken away, the only one of which by their nature they are
, they remain without control.
I know it will be presently observed, that when the one House Court of Legislature acts
in it's capacity of a Court of Judicator, it is then open
Identifier: | JB/096/238/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 96. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
096 |
legislation |
||
238 |
notoriety exclusion |
||
001 |
|||
text sheet |
1 |
||
recto |
|||
jeremy bentham |
[[watermarks::gr [crown motif] [britannia with shield motif]]] |
||
31242 |
|||