<span class="mw-page-title-main">JB/057/053/001</span>

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/057/053/001

Revision as of 11:42, 14 January 2019 by Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
Completed

Click Here To Edit

Evidence

1. of the Court in qua Forum in quo — English law.
If <add> the this is that consideration of utility, the <add>the of it is
it appears the
the if a consideration
If in consideration In the appear thought obvious, obvious that the mention of it
seems negatory, be sure of finding it neglected in English law.

In the fixation of the Court forum in quo the only consideration here
regarded, is the convenience of the pastries: the is the difference, as the case may be on the same occasion, this
is not the only consideration not attended to in English law

The note under which the law on this head causes falls to be ranged
is that of "changing the venue" Supposing the forum already not fixed
by other considerations — by some general rule, it falls naturally to
be fixed by him the party by whom the suit is commended — that is
by the plaintiff. But so effectually has the matter been
with a of giving him that option that will after all the pretended
exertions pretended to be taken with a view to certainty, the question issue is
kept afloat and remains still an co-exible source of fresh contests and
fresh fees. the plaintiff, that as his Attorney, choice makes
choice of that forum which best suits his the plaintiff: conveniences but what
in the ordinary state of things the plaintiff never knows, and his Attorney always knows is —
that this fixation will not stand good, any further than the defendant adversary
chooses to acquire in it: which in certain cases the Attorney knows before hand
he will not do, the same circumstance which render it
to the plff, rendering it inconvenient to the defendant. Hence an
application form the defendant to change the forum Court, to
as the language is — the venue: from which application, according
as it is opposable or unopposable, opposed or not opposed
is productive of more or less profit to the lawyers men of law more or less
vexation to the , but at any rate of some, and that whatever it be altogether
unnecessary without necessity or use and therefore pregnant with injustice therefore

( ) from the plan from ruin: the place district/County from out of which from whence the Jury was to
come. were the characteristic words in the order -the from
to the Sheriff of that county.



Identifier: | JB/057/053/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 57.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

057

Main Headings

evidence; procedure code

Folio number

053

Info in main headings field

[[info_in_main_headings_field::evidence[deleted]]]

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

18383

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in