JB/057/150/001

Click Here To Edit

1824 Nov 30 +
Procedure Code

Ch Obstruction
§ Applicants cointerests

§. Obstruction Multitude of applicants cointerests

1
Applicants cointerests
who

Art. 1. By the a cointerest of any person understand
in person having on the occasion in question an interest compound
with his; that the interest of the one can not
be affected but that the interest of the other will be or will be
liable to be affected; affected in the same manner as in some
other.

2
Cointerests
1 Persons conjointly
entitled to property
2 Persons having
received bodily injury<lb?> by the same maleficent
act

Art.2. Of the Cases in which persons more than one
be with in relation to another — examples .

1. Persons entitled each or supposing themselves entitled
each to a share in the a thing immoveable, a thing they morally
or an aggregate mass of things immoveable

2. Persons having received injury on body or passing
at the hands of a defendant from one and the same act.

<p.3
In this case defendants
attendance not to be compelled
till concurrence or non
concurrence of cointerests
ascertained

Art. 3. In this case exception excepted, the defendant
ought not to be compelled to attendance till the persons
cointerests have attended with made , or personally attendance or
their concurrence or non concurrence in the suit.

<p.4
Reasons
1 That defendant may
suffer but at the same
time but once the
vexation of attendance
& interrogation
2 That by dismissal
of application defendant
may be compleately
exonerated from the
demand

art.4 Reasons It is the of this fail these fails
1. The defendant would suffer the vexation of attendance, without
possessing the advantage of exacting appropriate admissions, and or by appropriate
counter interrogation to him,
from the any one absent as from the one present.
2. A by chance in favour of the applicant as against <add>in defence of the defendant
2. By a chance dismissing the application the defendant would
not be exonerated of the demand: for the applicants co-interests
not having been heard would notwithstanding this dismissal
retain the right to institute a suit during
the same service on the same ground.

Identifier: | JB/057/150/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 57.
Date_1	1824-11-30	Marginal Summary Numbering	1-4
Box	057	Main Headings	procedure code
Folio number	150	Info in main headings field	procedure code
Image	001	Titles	obstruction / multitude of applicants cointeressees
Category	text sheet	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	e1
Penner	jeremy bentham	Watermarks	j whatman turkey mill 1824
Marginals		Paper Producer	admiral pavel chichagov
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year	1824
Notes public		ID Number	18480
Box Contents