JB/541/421/002

Click Here To Edit

18

for the sake of the public, it will be but fitting they should be so included.
The compulsory powers of the Act being general, & excluding (according to a
general & very proper rule all Dwelling-houses, it was on that account
that neither the Cottages nor the Public House were included in the forced
purchase contracted conducted by the Supervisors: but after the naked land had
been secured, there was a voluntary treaty on foot, as I understood from
Sir Charles Bunbury, for the purchase of the Public House, to which
purchase no reluctance on the part of the landlord whoever he was (I
suppose the ownership was in the same hands as that of the adjacent
land) was testified.

Possibly with respect to such lots as are not comprised in the
verdict of the Jury, or at least some of them, a lease might be more
eligible or more practicable than an absolute purchase: if so, I should
have no objection, if it were of sufficient length or renewable.

It is with regret I reflect on the distance which operates as a
bar to those mutual explanations by which I flatter myself Your
Lordship's doubts might be effectually cleared up. Does Your Lordship
entertain any thoughts of resisvisiting

This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet

Identifier: | JB/541/421/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 541.
Date_1	1793-08-16	Marginal Summary Numbering
Box	541	Main Headings
Folio number	421	Info in main headings field
Image	002	Titles
Category	Correspondence	Number of Pages
Recto/Verso		Page Numbering
Penner		Watermarks
Marginals		Paper Producer
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year
Notes public		ID Number
Box Contents