JB/095/025/001

Click Here To Edit

Turnp. A. Unsteadiness of expression proved bad.

Lex univocalitatis

the proof of this is as follows is demonstrated from following considerations
The two causes are supposed to be of the same
effect directed to the same end, & reading isreading of
substantially by the same means.
Either then the importsignification of the of ,
and in each is precisely the same or it is
different
if it be precisely the same, then can no reason
to <gap?> and I be used why one oughtshould not sense for both - if
the interests if conformity are a reason why it should,
& there is a difference, then either each is equally proper to the effect required, or one is more
than the other.
If the former be.each be equally this , then it is shown no
reason against others being used for the of
there is the reason for it that has been encountered
above
If one is more so than the other, then it then
double reason for why that should be as
losely 1st of its proper as by the
2nd of conformity, as before

Identifier: | JB/095/025/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 95.
Date_1		Marginal Summary Numbering
Box	095	Main Headings
Folio number	025	Info in main headings field	turnp. a. unsteadiness of expression proved bad
Image	001	Titles
Category	text sheet	Number of Pages	2
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering
Penner	jeremy bentham	Watermarks
Marginals		Paper Producer
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year
Notes public		ID Number	30911
Box Contents