<span class="mw-page-title-main">JB/050/084/002</span>

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/050/084/002

Revision as of 04:51, 13 March 2014 by TCMemoire (talk | contribs) (Partial transcription)
Completed

Click Here To Edit

identical, and it is here that the arguing from preceding
precedents is an abuse, and ought not to
be permitted by the judge. — That this is
the idea adopted is the investigating the
in Testaments, is well known:
that the words dated from which it is to be judged
of being written words are in this case are permanent: Whereas
the from which it is to be
collected in criminal matters, are often
incommunicable in narration without exploratory indescribable
which are indescribable of . This therefore
should always be transmitted to the Jury
entirely where investigation the Judge should
not to be perplexed by pretended parallel
protectionsauthorities of decisions — here then on one
side may be placed the of general
regulations may be fixed; In considerable advancement
---page break---
made towards the implisscation
of the Law on this
ide] Homicide]

It is as to off cat
all where they must mislead, this
to them where they of
guide



Identifier: | JB/050/084/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 50.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

050

Main Headings

procedure code

Folio number

084

Info in main headings field

certainty law & fact. intention

Image

002

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

2

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[gr with crown motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

16075

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in