★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
Click Here To Edit Vesting the power of displacing in different hands from the power of appointing
This idea I take from + a very ingenious state paper published in America The use of this arrangement is it is then
+the title of it the original paper is </gap> of the convention of Delegates held at Ipswich in the county of Essex, who were deputed to take into consideration the constitution and form of government proposed by the convention of the state of Massachusetts Bay Apr. 29 1778. republished in Almon's Rememberancer No 86 p. 223.
A man's pride is interested in not condemning Almon's Rememberancer No 86 p. 223 his own </gap> Independent of affection He will therefore get to be be more backward in displacing the man giving ear to any complaints against the subordinate person appointed than another person would, and very probably than he ought. This consideration will help account for ... whatever bad conduct is to be observed in monarchical states when great powers are given to single persons in subordinate stations without witness or control other than that of the person to whom they owe their office. But the less the share in which any one person has in the appointment of such subordinate, the less strongly is his pride inherited in the affair: insomuch that when and when the appointment by in the number of hands it is vested in stands upon the footing of a popular election, this source of illusion seems scarcely to have place.
There is a reason it is to be opined, for why another besides them the person appointing granted have the power of displacing, not why he should have it should not be connected when
Identifier: | JB/087/104/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 87. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
087 |
indirect legislation |
||
104 |
indirect |
||
001 |
|||
text sheet |
4 |
||
recto |
f9 / f10 / f11 / f12 |
||
jeremy bentham |
[[watermarks::gr [crown motif] [britannia with shield motif]]] |
||
27629 |
|||