★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
Now then what how is this managed by our learned draughtsman? Occasions,
on which mention of an Oath is made
1830. Aug. 27
ReviewIX. VIII Nomography
2 Inconsistence.
Taught by , we could the
3. Needless diffusiveness and inconsistency and combined.
When a string of specific articles is come brought upon the carpet,
capable of being included all together under one generic
appellation – give exhibit the generic appellation in the first instance
speak of the specific article as being included in that genus
either as constituting composing the whole matter of it, or as being presenting so
many examples of it: do this once for all – the
grant in with the string of specific article, but imply
throughout the generic denomination in the room of it. This is
one of Bentham's Rules. By this means not only useless diffusiveness
but inconsistency and incomplete provisions are avoided.
Now as to this matter, note see observe what Brougham does, and
note the consequence.
☞ This rule does not exactly fit what follows.
Decisions in which power is given to the Judge to administer an
Oath. To No such mischievous ceremony would Bentham have
given any employment at all: but this in a parenthesis. Without
power to for warrant, the requisite security, what
would this or any other Judge be? What has now been
would be: nothing more. But if to this same Judge words in express
form for the clothes him with power were necessary
what use or what demand for enactments more than one.
Identifier: | JB/004/225/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 4. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
1830-08-27 |
not numbered |
||
004 |
lord brougham displayed |
||
225 |
review |
||
001 |
|||
text sheet |
1 |
||
recto |
c4 / c6 / e6 |
||
jeremy bentham |
j whatman turkey mill 1828 |
||
jonathan blenman |
|||
1828 |
|||
2146 |
|||