<span class="mw-page-title-main">JB/137/224/001</span>

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/137/224/001

Revision as of 11:35, 8 July 2020 by Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs) (Protected "JB/137/224/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite)))
Completed

Click Here To Edit

1819 Dec. 15th +
Radicalism not

1 §.3. <sic>ulto
<note>1 Nature of the case

4 §.4. Plan

§.3 — Radicalists defence. 1. Destruction of property not accused of
2. P

16 or 1
Defence What no
man can yet by, no man
will join in. See whether
both
17 or 2
by subversion of the rights
of property any man will
get any thing

That which Such being the accusation, none for the defence
can give it into . Aiming at the What nobody.no man can suppose they he can get any thing by, nobody will can/no man will join in. Of the phrase — aiming at the
Subversion of the rights of property being nonsense, the
meaning of it has any being ambiguous the supposed nearest at once
but that can be done is to find that sense which seem
obscure and ambiguous, let us give to it the only two senses it can
have. These are destruction of property, and near partition of the right

it seems to nearest to:
of property. the subversion effected, the subject matter will either have perished, and thus not
remain in any
hands at all, or it
will have passed into
other hands. In the
first case the subversion
is destruction, in the
other case new division
is partition.

18 or 3
1. destruction, no man
will get by: particular
points, in a moment of irritation,
yes: that may
be the object; but not
permanent and general.

As Now First as to Destruction of property destruction without transferThis is what men in a
state of irritation, men may indeed for the moment aim at — aim
at in a state of momentary irritation — aim at in
relation to this or that mass of property which lies immediately
at their power. but But this is not what is meant. the aim here computed is
a general one and a general destruction of property no
man in of his senses ever did or ever will aim
at.

19 or 4
2. New division is
partition. Yes, possible
threat in this, for the
moment some men
may see advantage for
themselves: Let us
long enough
for the formation of any
promising design
new enough to make
any advance towards
accomplishment should
entertain any such
design>

By subversion of the rights of property A new partition of property must therefore have been
the thing meant: the rights remaining must the
but the on which they are lodged different.

<p.remains for the object of the aim a new division or partition of property in general.
In a partition of this sort, it is possible that some
men will should, for the moment, or till they hear better, think they see an advantage for themselves. Let us see whether, it be possible that for a time for any
time long enough for the forming of a design affording any
the least provision of success, it be in the nature of the case that by a number of men
capable of making any advantage towards the accomplishment
of it, any it be morally possible — while it be
consistent with any observation or experience that any

such design should be entertained.



Identifier: | JB/137/224/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 137.

Date_1

1819-12-15

Marginal Summary Numbering

17 or 2 - 19 or 4

Box

137

Main Headings

radicalism not dangerous

Folio number

224

Info in main headings field

radicalism not

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e4

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

46941

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in