JB/124/034/001

Click Here To Edit

5 5
Panopticon Bill Choice Reasons

A new choice could therefore not therefore
be made with any propriety be made without
giving a deal of trouble to encreasing a load imposing a second load upon some of the first persons
of the Kingdom, whose time could very ill be
spared. It cost three years to get from them
a first choice: what would it how much more time would
it cost to get a second? What spot were it too would it be
expected they should choose? expected of them to choose? The same spot?
It would be actum agere: a solemn and expensive
farce. A different spot? — but why a different
one? They must condemn their predecessors: they
must condemn themselves: for in respect of a considerable part
if not a greater part of the number, if not the majority the body is
still composed of the same members. They must pass
condemnation then on the former choice: [and be what to
what purpose? and] but on what grounds? and to
what purpose? [I am sure I know not.]

Will it be said that the neg neighbourhood was
not</del. <Add>the not on that occasion<a/dd> sufficiently considered? the pleasurableness
of the neighbourhood situation, and the tasks and feelings
of its inhabitants? — That can not be. A prior
choice had actually</add. been made: that prior choice rejected
by this very tribunal, <add>and on this very ground of objection;
<Add>and<?add>

Identifier: | JB/124/034/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 124.
Date_1		Marginal Summary Numbering
Box	124	Main Headings	panopticon
Folio number	034	Info in main headings field	panopticon bill choice
Image	001	Titles
Category	text sheet	Number of Pages	4
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	d5 / d6 / d7 / d8
Penner	jeremy bentham	Watermarks
Marginals		Paper Producer
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year
Notes public		ID Number	41723
Box Contents