<span class="mw-page-title-main">JB/042/401/001</span>

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/042/401/001

Revision as of 16:42, 14 October 2022 by Keithompson (talk | contribs) (Protected "JB/042/401/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite)))
Completed

Click Here To Edit

1825 Nov. 8

Constitutional Code

copd

Ch.XII Judiciary collectively
§.21. Contested interpretation
reporting function

p.7 in the middle

Art. 16 Art . At the end of [ ] day after the
precontestion of the each such Justice Minister, Contested Interpretation Report to the
Legislation Minister for the use of the said committee,
if at if, without that time no mention has been made in the committee for the taking
sent Report into consideration, the interpretation so transmitted
fix approved or delivered by the Justice Minister will, be conn pted
as in the case of an exercise given to the Judges presenterpretive, as
per §.18 is to the eventually function as per §. 19 be considered as
adequate by the Legislative, and corresponding
amendment, directive or reciditive, or the case may
require applied to the body of the law appropriate part or parts of the will by the Legislative
Minister, be applied to the part or parts in question
of the body of the law as per Ch.XI §.2. Art. 13. ! Back to p.7 in the middle


Any Justice Ministers Interpretative Table

[+] From the
bottom of this page.

Art. 17 In this Report. At the and of this

Of these cases at the end of his said
Report, he will subjoin a separate Table in which Annual Interpretative Diversity commencing
with the Commencement of the Panmism, the
several words or passages which in the course of the
year have been respectively the subjects of a conflicting interpretations
-tations between Judicatory and on different the occasion of differentsuits, as in this Article
just mentioned,
will be exhibited with the conflicting interpretations
respectively applying to them and indicative if given
of the functioning and other through if any himself included
self to
given of the pursuer by ar they were respectively
prepared, with himself subjoining in each
instances any such remarks as he may see reason

to make.

To p.9.

(1)

From p.7 at bottom

Art. 48
In each of two or more having place between instituted by different parties and suits having commenced in
on different grounds and having no communication with one
with another it may happen that of the same word or
passage interpretation may has been given, and that the two
interpretations have been different from each other and conflicting.

To the middel of this page [+]



Identifier: | JB/042/401/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 42.

Date_1

1825-11-08

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

042

Main Headings

constitutional code

Folio number

401

Info in main headings field

constitutional code

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e8

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

"copd"

ID Number

13324

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in