★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
1827. May 10
Procedure Code
9
Ch.I All-embracing Arrangements
(7 §.2. Enumeration and Explanation
Probation By this appellation is designate a course of operations
which commence with application and costs due to the decision by
each or are awarded
It appears in law and
It may be pursued in law operative as for appellative
altogether and probative
Art 20
by Decree antecedent to the
termination may be termed
a mandate or order
Mandate or Order — is the appellation by which may be distinguished
any decree antecedent to, that is to say/which is as much as to say other than, the terminative.
A decree may be with reference to one two suitors or other co-applicants, one or more, terminative: with reference
to others, one or more, continuative.
In this case the decree
may be considered as
composed of and resolvable
decrees as
as many suitors or
other applicants.
3. Execution. 4. Dismissal. These two operations require to be
considered together: the one being performed in one case, the other
in the opposite case: by by executor the suit receiving its termination
in favour of the pursuer: by dismissal, in favour of a the defendant
Art. 21
A decree terminative with
reference to co suitors or
co applicants one or more
may be continuative with
reference to others one or
more. In this case the
decree resolvable into as
many elementary decrees
as there are co-suitors or
co- applicants</note>
Relative time at which dismissal may have place
any time whatsoever from the first moment of the applic at which the minute application is made
to the last moment of the suit inclusive: at what limit so ever preferred
to the last moment of the suit inclusive: with reference to the applicant
whose application is dismissed, at what it puts an end to the application
: if the application has been productive of the commencement of a suit,
to the suit.
Art 24
Of Execution the operator
either 1 the Judge or 2 a
person other than the Judge
Pursuer whose operative execution is may be capable of being are
the Judge himself or 2 a person functionary other than the Judge
Art 25
Case where Judge's operation
suffices for execution
that where the remedy
applied for is an act of
registration on the part of
the Judge, as where a mere
declaration of a right is
applied for
For execution the Case in which the operation an act of the Judge
himself suffices, unless the operation of registration performed by the Judiciary functionary<lb?>termed the Registrar be is considered as a distinct operation is that
in which for the application of the remedy applied for or adu an act of registration
performed in compliance with and virtue of, the d a terminative decree of the Judge, suffices
as where the service demanded t at the hands of the Judge by
the application and such is the bare collection or transfer
of a right: no physical operation of which either a person or a thing
is the subject matter being necessary to the effectuation of such transfer
Identifier: | JB/055/033/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 55. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
1827-05-10 |
Art 20 - Art 25 |
||
055 |
Procedure Code |
||
033 |
Procedure Code |
||
001 |
|||
Text sheet |
1 |
||
recto |
D9 / E7 |
||
17754 |
|||