JB/050/123/001

Click Here To Edit

This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet

Certainty Counsel at Trials.
The difference must be
well attended to, by those
who would form to them-
-selves an unsophisticated
representation of the
rate of progress growth of our
own or any other Ju-
-risprudence, between the reason whereon an
institution may now be ... justified
& the motive whereon wherefrom
it was originally established —
A Man &c

A Man might be apt to Impute the origin of If any one should Prudently demand, according to the common opinion
this institution to a providential Zeal for Justice A Prudent usage say the Lawyers, established least
least guilt of so a nature might be enabeled out of the Law, of
the Law by the skill eloquence of an artful a skillfull pleader —
but he would be very much mistaken: But unluckily it was
considered ... that here, as usual, the Judge
might have the ... of the Scale; & have the
better chance . . . resemble for the Forfeiture —
For when the same questions were tried at the
suit of a private party, if we may believe
Edw. Coke, Council were "constantly allowed.
Certainly the accident of one person's happening to
prosecute rather than another, when the .. <hi rend='superscript'>for a Ground whether is done & over</hi> makes no difference.
in the nature of that Crime.

---page break---

Identifier: | JB/050/123/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 50.
Date_1		Marginal Summary Numbering
Box	050	Main Headings	procedure code
Folio number	123	Info in main headings field	certainty counsel at trials
Image	001	Titles	stare decisis
Category	text sheet	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering
Penner	jeremy bentham	Watermarks
Marginals		Paper Producer
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year
Notes public		ID Number	16114
Box Contents