JB/150/437/001

Click Here To Edit

In the case of the Excise, though the words put together would not
employed by the Act [Ch 12 C2.c.24.S.46] for all in be sufficient moment the adopting of the
the descroption of the district within which the Head Office present case a mode of description so vague
shall be stiuated are "in the City of London or within or that of <gap/without
"ten miles thereof" (a circle without a centre) thoseand without any distinguishable in
by which<add>[+]</add>the limits are marked out in the same Statutecentre or circumference. The mode of description [+] in the same Statute [S.48.]
with a view to local authority and jurisdiction, are here adopted Using Even in these cases it
<add>marked outexpressive of</add>upon the same plan of demarcation aswere easy to show that the mode here adopted
that which is here proposed to be adopted — "All partsadopted have been the preferable ones,
of the Cities of London and Westminster, with the Borough only propose any in between the present
of SOuthwark, and the several Suburbs thereof —" the of

Identifier: | JB/150/437/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 150.
Date_1		Marginal Summary Numbering	4 continued, 5
Box	150	Main Headings	police bill
Folio number	437	Info in main headings field
Image	001	Titles
Category	text sheet	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	d2 / f9
Penner	jeremy bentham	Watermarks	g & ep 1794
Marginals	jeremy bentham	Paper Producer	fr3
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year	1794
Notes public		ID Number	50658
Box Contents