JB/150/443/001

Click Here To Edit

Part. I Observations +Co
Police Bill

[8] [Remnants] Class 4th.p.6. In london there are a multitude of shops which deal who principally p.6SS 6
if not wholly in exclusively in remnants. If they
were not included in the licence-system, they would
afford secure marts fornew piece goods stolen from
manufacturer or dealer.

[9] [Badge] Class 5th.p.6. Precedents of Badges
worn required to be wornlaw or custom, or required to be worn, whither by
1. Paupers
2. Chimney Sweeps
3. Watermen.
4. Firemen.

In the case of the ChimneySweepers, it is for the benefit
of the individual wearing the badge, that it is required
to be worn. In the other casescase of Paupers, as now it is rather
for the benefit of the public than that of the individual
that it is the object in view. In the case of
Fireman it is used simply as athe use of the distinction it to
engage confidence: in the present case, rather to excite diffidence. In the case of few Watermen by whom it is worn as a distinction of the honourary kind. This latter instance it is presumed may be sufficient to reason justify the provision against the imposition of reflecting ignominy on the persons thus distinguished.

Identifier: | JB/150/443/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 150.
Date_1		Marginal Summary Numbering	8-9
Box	150	Main Headings	police bill
Folio number	443	Info in main headings field	part i observations police bill
Image	001	Titles
Category	text sheet	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	f15
Penner	jeremy bentham	Watermarks
Marginals	jeremy bentham	Paper Producer
Corrections	jeremy bentham	Paper Produced in Year
Notes public		ID Number	50664
Box Contents