<span class="mw-page-title-main">JB/117/115/004</span>

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/117/115/004

Revision as of 07:56, 25 November 2017 by Dabouali (talk | contribs)
Completed

Click Here To Edit Case relative to the Tothill Fields Bill

be a considerable National benefit. —

2 That the choice of the Spot in question could not upon the

whole be prejudicial to the Neighbourhood of that Spot. —

3. That on the contrary it would be beneficial to the Neighbourhood of that Spot.—

4. That with as few and as slight exceptions (if any) as in the case

of such a Transmutation of propety can occur, it would be beneficial

to every Description of Persons, interested in point of proprietary Right. —

5. That, at the same time, under the Circumstances of the case, no

express general consent could reasonably be to be expected. —

6. But, that is of the number of those cases, where consent

ought not to be looked upon as requisite.—

7. That such Consent, not being to be required by the Legislature,

need not be, nor ought to be, applied for in the character of a

condition sini que non, on the part of the Government, by whom, if at

all, the Bill will be brought forward. —

8. That the attempt to act in all points in concurrence with

two such unwieldly bodies as a Vestry composed of 50 Members

and the Dean and Chapter, would present such a prospect of

delay as no Individual concerned in the execution of the measure

would expose himself to, especially in addition to a chain of altogether

unexpected (not to say unexampled) delays) that have

already consumed a period of between five and six Years. —

9. That in a case so perfectly in point as to have embraced the

same parochial District and the same parties, an Act creating

powers of the same sort, but much stronger and attended with

prodigiously greater hardship, and having much less strong

(if any) Public Ground for its support, was passed, not only

without application for consent, but against a strong and general

opposition, on the part of the parties principally interested. —

10... That the proposed improvement of the Waste cannot be
rejected, but for reasons, which, if admitted, would set up a

perpetual Bar to its ever being improved at all. —









Identifier: | JB/117/115/004"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 117.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

117

Main Headings

panopticon

Folio number

115

Info in main headings field

case relative to the tothill fields bill

Image

004

Titles

Category

collectanea

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f13 / f14 / f15 / f16

Penner

Watermarks

g & ep 1794

Marginals

Paper Producer

fr3

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1794

Notes public

ID Number

38732

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in