★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
Click Here To Edit Punishment distinguished and defined
In the case of self-preservation, and self-pres defence, the
evilmay either be directly intentional or only obliquely
intentional: if however it is directly intentional, it
is inflicted in the way of punishment: at any rate it
is inflicted on for the purpose of restraint, which is one
of the purposes of punishment.
In the case of safe-custody, it may also be either
directly or only obliquely intentional: if however
it is directly intentional it is only for the
purpose of restraint. But this is rarely the case;
in general what evil it produced by measures
of safe-custody, is generally only obliquely and negatively intentional,
and is gener the effect of indolence on the
part of those under whose direction it is administer'd.
When it is directly intentional, the most
common case is for it to be ? intentional
and to be inflicted for the purpose of gratifying
antipathy.
In the cases of combination, ofa personal obligation or a tax, as such it
is never any more than obliquely intentional.
The
In the case of restraint and in that of compulsion
the painor evilthat is producedissometimesisall
of itno more thanobliquely intentional, sometimes it is inpart
of it isdirectly intentional, and then it is of the
nature of punishment.
This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet
Identifier: | JB/159/010/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 159. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
not numbered |
|||
159 |
punishment |
||
010 |
punishment distinguished |
||
002 |
|||
text sheet |
2 |
||
recto |
[[page_numbering::d17 / f10[3] / f[1]04]] |
||
jeremy bentham |
s. lay |
||
alexander mavrokordatos |
|||
53833 |
|||