★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
1 March 1811
2. Lay out of the case the above suppose attendant 20.
I productive of evil
otherwise in consideration
of evil antecedently<
sustained, be the
ultimate object, the
act is an act done
in gratification of
antipathy:
but is evil the less
an act of punishment
evil, the antecedent injury, you have no longer one the case still
an act of punishment vengeance. What you have
is not an act performed in and for the gratification of
mere antipathy. But the supposition having for its
author or agent the man in power the legislator or the
judge, it is still - it is not the less an act of punishment.
Of acts and habits of punishment on the point of men in power having for their 21
Preference if such
anti-pathetic punishment
-punishment
for heresy in opinion
or tast
object neither more nor less than the gratification of antipathy
instances of an abundant are to be found in the
codes of all malices affordpresent instances in abundance:
differences in matter ofopinion; differences in matters of taste:
holding opinionsan opinion different from thosethat of the man in power 22
In these cases, to
save the punishment
from the reproach of being
ultimately intentional
the existence of antecedent
evil in that the prevention
of which is the object of
the punishment may
sometimes be pledged
deriving pleasure from senses a source from which he
derives no such pleasure.
Here the punishments inflicted on the of heresy,
the punishment attached to this or that gratification
many of the irregularities of the sexual appetite.
Identifier: | JB/159/044/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 159. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
1811-03-01 |
20-23 |
||
159 |
punishment |
||
044 |
|||
001 |
note (a) |
||
text sheet |
1 |
||
recto |
d8 / e8 |
||
jeremy bentham |
|||
53867 |
|||