JB/011/154/001

Click Here To Edit

1829 March 19 2
Petition

Supplement

J.B. & Brougham

J B. & Brougham reasons
of the difference between
them

2

when then — a defence so great wide as has been
alluded to — can it have proceeded? Answer from two
sources, law and practice situation. To go into any detail
approaching to Client to which the matter of this Petition,
been excluded itself would have been altogether
to a or herculean as that in question
been altogether incompatible with continuance in the possessors
— if what be as so bright an ornament: in
and scarcely less so would have been the speaking of that other
profession with a freedom approaching to that with which
it has been spoken of in the above these same Petitions.
a which without which it would have been
the task could not with any reasonable encouraging hope of success
have been undertaken: because so long as the issue of Judge
and profession of Advocate or needs any
Agent of the party were are in the same hands

This consideration, it appeared to me that to <ad> my</add>
have attempted to convey to him any conception of the
work could have had no better effect than that of producing
useless annoyance: accordingly it will not to his eyes and those of the public an end
the will it have conveyed it

By this declaration my learned friend is ceased of all
respectability and stands acquitted in the eyes of his learned brethren from all
of , with the so made upon them by the upon the learned
and renegarding hand.

Identifier: | JB/011/154/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 11.
Date_1	1829-03-19	Marginal Summary Numbering	not numbered
Box	011	Main Headings	law amendment
Folio number	154	Info in main headings field	petition
Image	001	Titles
Category	text sheet	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	c2 / d2
Penner	jeremy bentham	Watermarks	1828
Marginals		Paper Producer
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year	1828
Notes public		ID Number	3851
Box Contents