JB/011/139/001

Click Here To Edit

1829 Aug. 10.
Reformists reviewed.

Peel.

1
Peel will do nothing
against without the Judges
Judges nothing against
their own interest and
prejudice

Peel. Brougham perils to J.B.? (1)

When one sees the production of Mr Gill one knows not very well
to which part of his form his intellectual or his moral like — the Back-quacking part

In regard to hopes for Mr Peel the matter closed
there. Mr Peel will not bring forward any thing that is not approved
of by Members to Judges: the Judges will not approve
of any thing that runs contra to their own interest and interest-begotten
and authority begotten prejudices: and nothing that
of stature is good and now nothing as this that as we
admire to those same adverse interests

2
No intellect for judging
of his own accord whatever
intellect he had, enfeebled
by Alma Mater

How much He sits in the lap of these two Nurses,
how should he do otherwise. This judging on any thing on
its own morals no intellect does he possess. Whatsoever
intellect nature gives him was become enfeebled and rendered
rickety in this perjury — growing nursing soil of his Alma Mater

If a source presents a tolerably instructive
how much more instructive the i
magistri! At his back for every into the published word, he
person at in the , suckled from the dugs of Lord Eldon what better
could have been expected from him?

3
Peel's acts — their wretched
inaptitude — the more
flagrant the faults
the more pertinacious
is Peel in his adherence
to them

Before as has a copy of Mr Peel's 12th which
with such triumphant voice and gesture was bounderstuck before the eye
of Mr Brougham while making use of them his speech his speech

If Mr Bentham did not could not find him we should, as
other of us have taken it in hand and taken it to pursue
shewn the wretched inaptitude of this whole and even part of it,
had we not before us process so compleatly conclusive
that the more flagrant the faults exposed to view the
and the more compleatly incapable he found himself
of producing any thing in the shape of a reason in support
of them the more pertinacious would be his adherence
to him the more immovable his determination
to cause them on each future occasion to be exactly scrupulously
copied repeated.

Identifier: | JB/011/139/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 11.
Date_1	1829-08-10	Marginal Summary Numbering	1-3
Box	011	Main Headings	law amendment
Folio number	139	Info in main headings field	reformists reviewed
Image	001	Titles
Category	text sheet	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	c1
Penner	jeremy bentham	Watermarks	b&m 1829
Marginals		Paper Producer	arthur moore; richard doane
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year	1829
Notes public		ID Number	3836
Box Contents