JB/071/189/002

Click Here To Edit

2. C Of Culpable Insolvency.

2. 2 — Rashness ab initio Where he represented himself as having a probable chance upon
grounds which eventually proved false fallacious, and which he had no good reason
at the time to trust to , but which however he did trust to in effect and think them
probable . In this case the debt may be said to have been contracted
rashly . In this case, we see, it is his understanding that was in fault.

3. 3 — Through Prodigality. Where he became afterwards unable to discharge it through
prodigality. In this case it is his Will that was in fault.

4. 4 — Through Mismanagment. Where he became afterwards unable to discharge it through
mismanagement . In this case it was his Understanding that
was immediately in fault.

The case of Mis-management may be resolved into three
others. 1. Indolence. 2. Incapacity. And 3. Rashness or Presumption.
Indolence is the fault of the Will . Incapacity is more immediately
the fault of the Understanding. Rashness or Presumption seems to be is the
fault of the understanding and of the Will together.

5. 5 — Litigiousness. Where he became afterwards unwilling to pay , meaning to defer payment

---page break---

Note:

fraudulent Insolvlency , but Sharping . This circumstance marks out the
limits between fraudulent Insolvency and Sharping.

Identifier: | JB/071/189/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 71.
Date_1		Marginal Summary Numbering	not numbered
Box	071	Main Headings	penal code
Folio number	189	Info in main headings field	of culpable insolvency
Image	002	Titles
Category	copy/fair copy sheet	Number of Pages	4
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	f1 / f2 / f3 / f4
Penner		Watermarks	[[watermarks::myears [lion with crown motif]]]
Marginals		Paper Producer	caroline fox
Corrections	jeremy bentham	Paper Produced in Year
Notes public		ID Number	23592
Box Contents