JB/015/151/001

Click Here To Edit

Morality can have no other end thanMorality, Religion Politics, Meet Between Morality
can, indeed only have an end common

If the Politician. Moralist, and Divine all know what they are about, their
purposes can be no other than the same.

The Politician's end is, I think,is universally allowed to be happiness - The
happiness of the State - the greatest happiness possible among the individuals of
a state during the present life.

To the Politician, as such, hence is given to make this his end by
all parties I think in whatever may be there opinion on Religion and in or Morals; by all parties I think, without
one dissenting voice.

This being the case, it were strange if the ends of the other two mustwere allowed to be different.
If so, each pursuing his end by means that were different, how were they so - if different happen and upon occasion opposite,
at the least. or most were burned - if the Divine and the Moralist by means that were contemplated result contrary opposite to those of intended by the
Politician. They would be in a state of universal warfare. Each would be reduced for
his security, or for the furtherance of his end. A fight against the other two with such
weapons as he is master of. The divine would denounce his antagonist. or his

Identifier: | JB/015/151/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 15.
Date_1		Marginal Summary Numbering
Box	015	Main Headings	deontology
Folio number	151	Info in main headings field
Image	001	Titles
Category	linking material	Number of Pages	2
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	f20 / f21
Penner	sir john bowring	Watermarks	[[watermarks::j rump 1831 [britannia with shield emblem]]]
Marginals		Paper Producer	ann elizabeth lind; franz ludwig tribolet
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year	1831
Notes public		ID Number	5367
Box Contents