<span class="mw-page-title-main">JB/042/138/001</span>

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/042/138/001

Revision as of 13:40, 1 June 2021 by Keithompson (talk | contribs)
Completed

Click Here To Edit

1826. Decr 12

Constitutional Code

Ch. XII S.5. Number 11. Employed Art.11. In no country are there as many judicatories as the service requires. Of the money which rulers are willing to allot to the service, the greatest part is wasted upon supernumerary Judges. 12. Employed Art.12. Only a still more abundantly operative cause, is the operation of in the production of the denial of justice, kept out of the people's sight: viz. by law taxes and fees, official and professional. 13. Employed — Art 13. In each Judicatory delay is increased by the addition of the second judge. Increase proportioned to the part which, if honest, he takes in the business: 1. By time, occupied in making up his own mind. 2. In discussing the matter with the superior. — 14. Employed Art 14. If by corruption or sympathy or antipathy either has a sinister interest, which is promoted by delay, he may produce it without scandal, by pretending doubts, and while promoting this sinister interest, acquire the reputation of extraordinary moral aptitude on the score of extra anxiety to judge right. —
---page break---

Ch. X.II Instructional & Gallici S.5. Number 15. Art.15 With these principles compare the French and English practice. In French practice, errors in principle, consisting in applications. 16. Art 16. In English, principle none: inconsistency, consummate. 17. Art 17. In French practice, the principle assumed is probability of justice is in the direct ration of the number of judges in each Judicatory. 18. Art 18. Causes of this error. 1. The real use of a Colleague to the first chosen Judge, to serve as a check before the existence of a Public Opinion Tribunal, capable of serving as a check. 19. Art 19.2. The practice of selling judicial offices to raise money for monarch's use's the judges indemnifying themselves by taxing suitors. By this practice was produced authority together pupildice in favour of multiplicity.





Identifier: | JB/042/138/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 42.

Date_1

1826-12-12

Marginal Summary Numbering

11-22

Box

042

Main Headings

constitutional code

Folio number

138

Info in main headings field

constitutional code

Image

001

Titles

Category

marginal summary sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e2

Penner

john flowerdew colls

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

jeremy bentham

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

[[notes_public::"relates to judges only: not to minister" [note in bentham's hand]]]

ID Number

13061

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in