★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
1826. Octr 25.
Review of Humphreys.
Ch. Formula
1 All topics
I. Identity, Reasons
II. Topics, Reasons
4*
H. should in his samples
housed have made
references to the relative ma
in his Code.
I. Same ideas, same words
1. Result of comparison
of all three Draughts.
1. Rule. 1. Eadem natura
eadem nomenclatura,
violated.
2.
Reasons for observance
1. For all repetitions, one
labour of attention
serves in all writers and
readers.
2. So, one reference.
3. Obviated the obscurity
and ambiguity
from difference of expression,
where identity
of import is intended;
diversity being thus declared,
where diversity
is intended, no other
mode is there than this
for expressing it.
3.
Of this, H. is not aware
4.
Rule II. For giving instruction
relative to
the particulars of a
legal instrument, give
the in general
terms to serve as rules.
The examples suffice
not of themselves.
5.
1. Only in so far as
the aptly frames to himself
the rule, will the
intended individual
copyist be able to conform
to it. Giving the
rule, the Legislator
saves all this labour
and the danger of aberration.
II. Topical Denominations
5 contind
2. Universally and instantly
intelligible will
these topical words be.
The appropriate words are
all, in universal use.
3. All will need to be
taken for subject matters
of exposition or enactment
in the Code of
the subject.
4 Several may need to
be subject matters of
instruction and direction,
by notes at bottom
of the instrument itself.
6.
By H. These topics are inserted in the samples
for superseding
which his are intended:
to wit, in marginal notes
and in Acts of Parliament.
Identifier: | JB/078/009/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 78. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
1826-10-25 |
1-6, 1-7, or 1, 2-6, or 7 - or 8, 9-10, or 11 - or 12 |
||
078 |
Review of Humphreys |
||
009 |
Review of Humphreys |
||
002 |
|||
Marginal summary sheet |
2 |
||
recto |
|||
J WHATMAN TURKEY MILL 1824 |
|||
Jonathan Blenman |
|||
1824 |
|||
25100 |
|||