JB/042/443/001

Click Here To Edit

1824. July 11

Constitutional Code. Ch. XII Judiciary Collectively
S. Presider protective function

4
Art.4 Result of the
exercise of presperlative
function is in
either case a propsed
amendment. In the mode
of applying it to the Law
see below Art.6

From an exercise of the meliorative interpreti printer prelative
power of the Judge if adopted by the Legislature, the text
of the law receives an amendment. For the modes in which this
adoption is effected one below Art.

—

Preinterpretive the operation is in this case stiled - not
simply interpretation. The reason is that in this case of simple
interpretation, the correspondent and commonly concomitant power of opinion deserves opstive and imperative
have been called for at the hand of the Judge, by an application
on the part of some pursuer, subject to opposition on the
part of some person in the character of Defendant.

—
5
Art.r. Modes in which
this function of exercisible
1. Spontaneous: exeercised
by the Judge of his own
accord;
2. Obtemperative:- at
the suggestion of an instent
applying
after the manner of a
suitor: as per Procedure
Code Ch. Application
Consultation the mode
of application here
in so far as form is
subject
Modes two in either of which this function may be

Identifier: | JB/042/443/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 42.
Date_1	1824-07-11	Marginal Summary Numbering	4-7
Box	042	Main Headings	constitutional code
Folio number	443	Info in main headings field	constitutional code
Image	001	Titles
Category	text sheet	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	e2
Penner	jeremy bentham	Watermarks
Marginals	jeremy bentham	Paper Producer
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year
Notes public		ID Number	13366
Box Contents