JB/034/194/001

Click Here To Edit

1823. Octr<hi rend="underline">..</hi> 19

Constitutional Code. or Procedure 1. Enactive PartRatiocinate

Ch. Quasi-Jury
1. App function
§.

III. Rationale. Quasi-jury part.

Question Why are the cases of Judicial-rapacity officers admitt
of Appeal?

Question Why not admitt of Appeal without a warrant
from a Quasi Jury?

To these two questions this connected, in
separate answer can to give.

Reasons

1. Appeal is eventually allowed, best if to a single Judge without
any presumptively contracting Jury the piece of aflicting punishment to such a extent price, the security against endeavour
and oppression should be regarded as notinsufficient sufficiently
strong.

Identifier: | JB/034/194/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 34.
Date_1	1823-10-19	Marginal Summary Numbering
Box	034	Main Headings	constitutional code
Folio number	194	Info in main headings field	constitutional code procedures ratiocinative part
Image	001	Titles	rationale - quasi jury part
Category	text sheet	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	c1 / e1
Penner	jeremy bentham	Watermarks
Marginals		Paper Producer
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year
Notes public		ID Number	10468
Box Contents