<span class="mw-page-title-main">JB/096/004/001</span>

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/096/004/001

Revision as of 18:16, 25 January 2012 by TB Editor (talk | contribs) (Reverted edits by TB Editor (Talk) to last revision by JFoxe)
Completed

Click Here To Edit

It is sometimes a useful & oftenner still an amusing
eng object to trace the errors of a great man to their
source. — Whence How came our Author to fall into this
confusion of ideas? How could he descant so gravely on
the action of inactive matter? On the obligation of
unconscious Being? On acts of superiority exercised &
of inferiority allowed by one & the same Being over
himself? On the free agency of a Being tied down by
absolute necessity?— There was one thing our Author could do: that is,Gentle reader! He could read.—
read. There is another thing he could not do: this is, extract the spirit of what he
read! It is with this commentator, as with so many other Commentators: his appetite
is better than his Digestion. But the powers of digestion do not always keep pace
with the voracity of the appetite:


[Our author had pored over] Montesquieu.— And he had read. Montesquieu
had written upon Laws in general in a manner almost as unintelligible, tho' not
quite so inconsistent. The errors of Montesquieu were the errors of an original genius struggling under the heap of confusion accumulated by his predecessors. A great part
of this heap he has contributed to remove. The tasks of Montesquieu are daunting to
our Author.
[there] he had found as follows:— "Tous les etesont Esp. des Loix. L.1 C.l
"leurs loix: la Divinite a ses loix: — le monde materiele ses
"loix: les intelligences superieur a l'homme ont leurs
"loix, les betes ont leurs loix: l'homme a ses loix."
And


---page break---

"He must necessarily be subject to the
"will of his Creator:" — "He must inevitably
"take the will of him, on whom he depends,
"as the rule of his conduct:"—" It is necessary
"that he should in all points conform to
"his maker's will." If this representation
be true, what occasion for a system of laws?
To what purpose does the learned professor
take so much pains to prove the a conformity
which does not exist
between the laws of England, and the laws
of God. And, that conformity supposed, why
is he so eloquent in enforcing obedience to
these laws? this is all labor lost, if man is
necessitated to obey the laws of his maker if Creator
man in

3) 7)


---page break---


Identifier: | JB/096/004/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 96.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

096

Main Headings

comment on the commentaries

Folio number

004

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

collectanea

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c7 / c8 / c9 / c10

Penner

168

Watermarks

[[watermarks::gr [quartered royal arms motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

jeremy bentham

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

[[notes_public::"to be copied" [note not in bentham's hand]]]

ID Number

31008

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in