<span class="mw-page-title-main">JB/096/036/002</span>

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/096/036/002

Revision as of 08:45, 6 December 2010 by TB Editor (talk | contribs)
Completed

Click Here To Edit


To be copied human laws to be binding upon mens multitude of penal laws I neither know: no doubt the multiplicity
Consciences, then the multitude of penal of our penal laws is an evil: but a much greater evil, & which is much more likely to ensnare us, is their want of precision in
"laws would not only be looked upon as enouncing them: s the want of proportion of fixing them: & the want of publicity in promulging them. Let the Legislature
"an impolitic, but would also be a very wicked measure the degree by the ends of punishment: let it explain
itself with precision: let it not notify it's will with sufficient

thing, if every such law were a Subject
publicity, & there will be no thing impolitic or wicked in our
penal laws: no fear <add>
of their multitudes honed ensnare</add>
"snare for the conscience of the Subject".
men's consciences.

The mistake of our Author seems
— He says, what I profess I do not understand.
The Author seems to imagine, that the moral sanction has
The n The Author saw th or thought he saw some difference

If the Legislature explains
in what he calls the natural & municipal Law: this
difference <add>lies
was this, that his natural law had only the</add>
itself with precision, and notifys it's
moral, & not the legal Sanction: he mistook
not in their directory but in sanctionary part: for the rule

will with sufficient publicity, I cannot
of conduct for a good man & a good Citizen must be the
same: the Characters are inseparable. Here was the

understand, how it can ensnare the
Author's first mistake: Because the sanctions are different
he supposed the end to be so too. He saw likewise or thought

conscience of the Subject. I do not mean
he saw some difference in the sanctionary part &
the difference is, that his natural law has only the moral

to justify the multiplicity of our penal Laws
sanction, not the legal: here again he mistook: & because
municipal law has the legal sanction, concluded it could
not have the moral: & therefore supposing Conscience
to let know not what, & affected only the the moral <add>sanction
</add>

97



Identifier: | JB/096/036/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 96.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

096

Main Headings

comment on the commentaries

Folio number

036

Info in main headings field

Image

002

Titles

Category

collectanea

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c96 / c97 / c98 / c99

Penner

168

Watermarks

[[watermarks::gr [quartered royal arms motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

[[notes_public::"to be copied" [note not in bentham's hand]]]

ID Number

31040

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in