JB/119/013/001

Click Here To Edit

81

Supplemental hints and observations

proposed expedients, to distinguish between removeable
difficulties and radical objections:

1 Liable to be exaggerated on both sides 2. Familiarizing crimes 3. Corruption/Compliance of familiars/families.

(Add full cross out here later) FIX ALL MISTAKES AT NEXT SITTING.

I thought so as well to introduced the
mention of the mode plan of punishment in question on
the personal occasion as it bears so close on ontology
to the punishment proposed to be established in the labor-houses
and is so proposed to be so ordered if at all
as to depend upon that establishment for its execution.
It may perhaps at some future time be a proper
subject for excitement: the only point that seems
clear at present is that it is not fit to be admitted
as an original punishment of itself but only as
an occasional indulgence to be substitued isntead occasionally
to the other.

This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet

Identifier: | JB/119/013/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 119.
Date_1		Marginal Summary Numbering
Box	119	Main Headings	panopticon
Folio number	013	Info in main headings field	supplemental hints and observations
Image	001	Titles
Category	text sheet	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	f81
Penner	jeremy bentham	Watermarks	[[watermarks::l v g propatria [britannia motif]]]
Marginals		Paper Producer	caroline vernon
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year
Notes public		ID Number	39524
Box Contents