JB/073/080/001

Click Here To Edit

9
C
Simple Personal Injuries

In the four first of the above cases there is
room for heedlessness or negligence.

In the 7th case the intention is as perfect
with respect to the damage as it can be: the only difference between that
case, and the case where the eventual damage was
ultimately intentional is that in this latter case
the motive is hatred or revenge, and in the former
not that but some other.

When no particular reason appears for
attributing a personal injury to any other motive
the natural presumption is that the motive was hatred or
revenge.

Where a personal injury appears to have
been intended the presumption is that the damage
that happen'd was the damage that was intended

Gross negligence may when at the extreme
be equal equivalent to intention

Where any damage was intended, let
full compensation be given for all the damage that was
done. but let punishment be given applied only for so much
as was intended.

Where more damage was intended than
ensued, let punishment be applied on account of the
, as for an attempt.

Where no damage was in any way intended,
and there was no heedlessness degree of negligence
is in any respect imputable to the author, let compensation
be thus order'd. 1 . Let such a sum be supposed to be
exacted

Identifier: | JB/073/080/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 73.
Date_1		Marginal Summary Numbering	not numbered
Box	073	Main Headings	law in general
Folio number	080	Info in main headings field	simple personal injuries
Image	001	Titles
Category	text sheet	Number of Pages	4
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	f9 / f10 / f11 / f12
Penner	jeremy bentham	Watermarks	[[watermarks::gr [crown motif] [britannia with shield motif]]]
Marginals	jeremy bentham	Paper Producer
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year
Notes public		ID Number	23920
Box Contents