JB/038/133/001

Click Here To Edit

11
1822 July 16
Constitut. Code RationaleSupreme Operative
1

not error.

Supreme Operative
95 or 1. +
Quantity of misrule givens
question in what proportion
the result of sinister
interest, i.e. of the will, in
what the result of intellectual
prejudice inaptitude etc. i. e. of the
judgment.

Not unnatural immaterial is the
answer with a view to
practice.

96 or 2. +
Answer. To sinister interest
now, whether or not
originally; preservation,
yes: whether or not creation.

97 or 3. +
True, for creation and
preservation of what is
absurd and mischievous,
intellectual weakness has
always existed for absurdity
even palpably detrimental
to the interest of the
entertainers.
But so has sinister interest.

98 or 4. +
Many are the cases in
which what has to a first
view appeared the result
of weakness, has on a
second been found to
result from sinister
interest.

Generally interest has
been the cause in the
minds of the _____ governors;
weakness in do of
the subject multitude.

99 or 5. +
For preserving whatsoever
is called mischievous or
absurd, or both, one general
reason suffices. To
justify the abolition, you
must call in reason:
you must refer to greatest
happiness principle,
you must thus admitt
the applicability of it.

Identifier: | JB/038/133/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 38.
Date_1	1822-07-16	Marginal Summary Numbering	[[marginal_summary_numbering::95 [or] 1 - 108 [or] 14]]
Box	038	Main Headings	constitutional code rationale
Folio number	133	Info in main headings field	constitut. code rationale
Image	001	Titles	supreme operative
Category	marginal summary sheet	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	d11
Penner	john flowerdew colls	Watermarks
Marginals		Paper Producer
Corrections	jeremy bentham	Paper Produced in Year
Notes public		ID Number	11770
Box Contents