★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
tine: but I have new since I have here at home read
it through and what received to me in the way of
advice was to confine it entirely to the first nine pages
supposing that it is that land and no other that will
be fined on. The grand effort of all the rest I think
must have been produced by Dundas & Long having
read it who knew and will but others knew (if they are
at all disposed to hear) what strong arguments you have
in store. In this case I think I should in reading it so
reduced to Dundas, tell him you have complied with his advice
respecting the measure by leaving out all arguments about
the land, trusting that if save to say henever the
in which you had them induced to start the arguments in
favour of that land to the inclusion of any other they could
not but have appened to him sufficiently strong.
But if you think it absolutely necessary to suppose they mean
to look for other land, and to the printed paper it
seem to afford in a page to convince
where conviction is .
Do pray come immediately and let the delay be no longer at your .
|
Identifier: | JB/541/615/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 541. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1794-10-27 |
|||
|
541 |
|||
|
615 |
|||
|
001 |
|||
|
Correspondence |
|||
