<span class="mw-page-title-main">JB/150/464/001</span>

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/150/464/001

Revision as of 11:49, 9 March 2015 by Petergh (talk | contribs)
Completed

Click Here To Edit

6 +Cd Observations
1.
Police Revenue Bill

24
A dealer having
two places of trade
distant from each
other ought to pay
double duty - why

ʃ6 [1] [Place of Trade]. p.20. p.25. Another cluster of topics calling for decision
to prevent obviate doubts. That which confines the effect
of the licence to one place is taken from a string the following
of precedents - 25 G.3 40. ʃ.826 G.2. c.31. ʃ.3. Alehouse Keepers. Pawnbrokers 25 G.3. c.49. ʃ.4
36 Coachmakers — 35 G.3. c.17. ʃ5. Horse dealers -
If the same person has more places of trade than one, while having
the trade of a different neighbourhood, he may be supposed capable of [+]

[+] paying in proportion,
upon the principle here pursued
in the case of Costs.
See Note [13].

25
A dealer having
two places of trade
almost contiguous,
ought not to pay
double duty - why

ʃ6. [2] [One hundred Yards] - p. 20 A qu random quantity put
by way of example. I would Several instances
have fallen under my observation of where a Tradesman
for want of room in one shop or warehouse has had another
on the opposite side of the Street. A precedent of the In this case, the reason
of the quantity of intervening space that shall for the multiplicati above given for the multiplication <add>repetition of the license</add>
the unity of a plan, duty, viz: the having the benefit of different neighbourhoods, and
keeping thence of different sorts of customers, does not hold good. Two Warehouses at a distance from
one another are not more convenient, but less convenient, than
a single one capable of holding the same quantity of goods.

26
Partnership,
a case requiring
to be provided
for

ʃ.6 [3] (partners) p. 20. The case of Partners presented
itself on reflection. It has been provided for in some itself on reflection as a case in which, if the requisite exception
were not used the letter of the law would run counter to the fact

Provision has accordingly been made for it in some of the
late precedents: viz: 25 G.3. c.48. ʃ.8. Pawnbrokers.
35 G.3. c.17. ʃ.5, abovementioned, Coachmakers. 35
G.3. c.17. ʃ5, abovementioned — Horse-dealers. 37
G.3. c.108. ʃ.29. Watchmakers.

ʃ.6 [4] [A separate Recognizance]. p.25 The recognizances being intended
as a standing memento or warning to each individual,
to put him upon his guard against falling into
transgressions which acts of delinquency, such as in some instances might come
to be committed by one Partner without the participation
of the next, it seemed advisable that each
individual should




Identifier: | JB/150/464/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 150.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

24-26

Box

150

Main Headings

police bill

Folio number

464

Info in main headings field

police revenue bill

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

b6 / f36

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

jeremy bentham

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

50685

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in