★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
Vesting the power of displacing in different hands
from the power of appointing
This idea I take from + a very ingenious
state paper published in America. The use of this arrangement is
A man's pride is it is then interested in not condemning
Almon's <unclear>Rememberancer
No 86 p. 223 his own Independent of affection He will therefore get to be be more
+ the title of it the original paper is
of the convention of Delegates
held at Ipswich in the
county of Essex, who were
deputed to take into consideration
the constitution
and form of government
proposed by the convention
of the state of Massachusetts
Bay Apr. 29 1778. republished in Almon's
Rememberancer No 86 p. 223.
backward in displacing the man giving ear to any
complaints against the subordinate person appointed than another
person would, and very probably than he ought.
This consideration will help account for whatever
bad conduct is to be observed in monarchical
states when great powers are given to
single persons in subordinate stations without witnessor
other than that of the person to
whom they owe their office. But the less the share
in which any one person has in the appointment
of such subordinate, the less strongly is his
pride inherited in the affair: insomuch that when
and when the appointment by in the number of hands
it is vested in stands upon the footing of a popular
election, this source of illusion seems scarcely
to have place.
There is a reason it is to be opined, for why another
besides them the person appointing granted have the
power of displacing, not why he should have it should not be connected when
Identifier: | JB/087/104/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 87. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
087 |
indirect legislation |
||
104 |
indirect |
||
001 |
|||
text sheet |
4 |
||
recto |
f9 / f10 / f11 / f12 |
||
jeremy bentham |
[[watermarks::gr [crown motif] [britannia with shield motif]]] |
||
27629 |
|||