JB/120/071/002

Click Here To Edit

1) Narrative 18 Mar 1802
Charges against White Long Rise of Pitt

1. White

1. Refusal to prepare
contract 15 May 1799
J.B. to Long §§.5.C.12

3 2. Refusal to deliver
Deeds 15th Novr 1799

2
3. 2 Forming in clandestine
steps for obtaining
the money without the
party of J.B. that
the money might be
put into Ld S.'s
without the lands being
clear of leases. [+]
[+] and without J.
B.'s knowing that
the £1000 for the
clearing away the Leases
was not comprised
in it, whereby
J.B. was prevented
all that while from
soliciting the warrant
for the money
for himself for that
purpose according
to the plan offered
to and approved by
Long.

5
5. + + long suppressed
on that occasion
around
sending only the
unarmed one to
Wilful neglect in
not making any
from (4 Decr
day of Long's letter) to
23 Jan 1800 day of
J.B.'s application to
him (§§.6.D.7) on
pretence of J.B.'s
never having applied
to him — tho by Long's
Letter 20 Feb. 1800)
it appears that that very
day he made his Report.

<p. 6. wilful refusal
to him turn the Act on
that occasion — or
J.B.

7.
7. Taking upon himself
to oppose for
a frivolous reason,
the recommendation of the competent
authority (the Surveyor
General) he
being not not
competent to judge
but having no knowledge<lb?> of the matters
of fact in which the
eligibility of the venture
depended. See how
the Act is quoted in
Long's
&
Long's letter to J.B.
20 Feb. 1800. D.8.
the having no reason
to think the leases
would be bought out
for less than the £1000
but
7.
but having good
reason to think the
contrary, from the
Surveyor General's
Report

1. White

8
8. Refusing to fix
any day for the leases
to quit, but
requiring the Surrenders
of the terms
to be immediate
in consequence of
which the clause
not an edict
amounted to £12000
D.12 Wh. to J.B.
22 Feb. 1800.

9
9. Lowdes sending Counterparts of Leases
as desired by J.B.
for the dor entering
upon this treaty
he had been sent
upon according
to White's report
D.12 as above

10
10. Rights obtaining
the counterparts
of the Leases previous
to the completion
of the Conveyance —
although
he must have of their
existence from Estcourt
&c.

Lang

1
1 that having entered
into the conspiracy
for defeating the establishment,
and having
entered into the
plan or conspiracy<lb?> for wasting the public
money in the
purchase of Ld Salisbury's
estate for the
benefit of Ld Salisbury
in pretence of
its being for the establishment,
he proposed
the estate to J.B.
in the intent pretence
of intending to apply it to that
purpose, but intending
in fact
never so to do: he
undertook the management
of the business for the express wishes — of causing
it to miscarry.

2
2. Having promised
compliance with J.
B.'s application for
the Previous Contract
and having through
carelessness and for
want of seeing the
to the prejudice
of the object of<lb?> the conspiracy, obstructed<lb?> a resolution<lb?> of the Board
to that effect — and
announced it to J.
B. and written a letter
in conspiracy to White.

3. He either gave
or was privy to
secret orders application
without
and contrary to the<lb?> authority of the Board
for rendering the
direction of the Board
to White without
issuing.

Identifier: | JB/120/071/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 120.
Date_1	1802-03-18	Marginal Summary Numbering	1-10, 1-13
Box	120	Main Headings	panopticon versus new south wales
Folio number	071	Info in main headings field	[[info_in_main_headings_field::panopt. narrative charges against white long rise of […?] brouillon]]
Image	002	Titles	white / long
Category	marginal summary sheet	Number of Pages	2
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	f1 / f1
Penner	jeremy bentham	Watermarks	cw 1799
Marginals		Paper Producer	c. abbit lees
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year	1799
Notes public		ID Number	39897
Box Contents