JB/117/115/004

Completed

Click Here To Edit Case relative to the Tothill Fields Bill

be a considerable National benefit. —

2 That the choice of the Spot in question could not upon the

whole be prejudicial to the Neighbourhood of that Spot. —

3. That on the contrary it would be beneficial to the Neighbourhood of that Spot.—

4. That with as few and as slight exceptions (if any) as in the case

of such a Transmutation of propety can occur, it would be beneficial

to every Description of Persons, interested in point of proprietary Right. —

5. That, at the same time, under the Circumstances of the case, no

express general consent could reasonably be to be expected. —

6. But, that is of the number of those cases, where consent

ought not to be looked upon as requisite.—

7. That such Consent, not being to be required by the Legislature,

need not be, nor ought to be, applied for in the character of a

condition sini que non, on the part of the Government, by whom, if at

all, the Bill will be brought forward. —

8. That the attempt to act in all points in concurrence with

two such unwieldly bodies as a Vestry composed of 50 Members

and the Dean and Chapter, would present such a prospect of

delay as no Individual concerned in the execution of the measure

would expose himself to, especially in addition to a chain of altogether

Identifier: \| JB/117/115/004"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 117.
Date_1		Marginal Summary Numbering
Box	117	Main Headings	panopticon
Folio number	115	Info in main headings field	case relative to the tothill fields bill
Image	004	Titles
Category	collectanea	Number of Pages	4
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	f13 / f14 / f15 / f16
Penner		Watermarks	g & ep 1794
Marginals		Paper Producer	fr3
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year	1794
Notes public		ID Number	38732
Box Contents