<span class="mw-page-title-main">JB/036/095/002</span>

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/036/095/002

Revision as of 03:42, 14 December 2017 by Mctwsf (talk | contribs)
Completed

Click Here To Edit

So in the case of the when the proceedings are considered inquisitorial mode

When therefore precipitation in judiciation is spoken of, the
sort of shape in which the supposed undue precipitation presents itself naturally is - that
which has place so in so far as the Judge in pronouncing
upon the evidence and the argument had before him, fail of
occupying in the consideration of the subject so great a length
of time as is necessary to the securing the the decision here pronounced
the quality property <add>attribute of rectitude.

How a Precipitation in judicature thus understood,
now let us see whether of all it is the most
dangerous.

Look to English judicature. Wortm a Adverse as, to this system
in so large a part of its extent, ext the system is - uncontroveribly adverse
to the end of justice - still, taken as a whole it is perhaps the least upon the whole so if any as yet any where
established: stronger indeed it would be, if it were not
 : there much less is there that of Spain. Of this system
the part in most general estimation, & of the testimonial most generally exteemed and the part least reasonably
esteemed is that, in which a Juror per the judicating
is composed of a professional Judge, with a company of non-
professional Judges under the name of a Jury: the Jury, in the exercise of their functions, acting
in so far as , under the guidance of the Judge. To all
now - Immediately after the evidence with the <add>such comments <add>as have been made on it, is closed 1 not after it
without every the hearing any opinion from
before the Judge opinion of the Judge is pronounced always
the opinion decree of the Jury not for after
the hearing of that same opinion. The promptitude thus displayed
is it in the of precipitation to exceed it? This same promptitude
is given. has it ever, on the part of any person , been the subject of complaint? No never. Where promptitude in
this
this degree has place,
does it ever enter into
the any one man's corruption, that the any
such disapprobative appellations
as precipitation is in that account applicable
to it? No, never.
if such promptitude in
such a degree, and in no and greater
higher degree
can it have place?
whi is precipitation, preciptitaion so far from being the most dangerous a Spanish judicature can , may might with much more propriety be termed the petty










Identifier: | JB/036/095/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 36.

Date_1

1822-08-12

Marginal Summary Numbering

12-15

Box

036

Main Headings

constitutional code

Folio number

095

Info in main headings field

constitut. code

Image

002

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

a11 / b6 / d9 / e5

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::i&m [fleur de lys] 1818]]

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

arthur wellesley, duke of wellington

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1818

Notes public

ID Number

11019

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in