<span class="mw-page-title-main">JB/004/070/012</span>

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/004/070/012

Revision as of 22:33, 29 December 2017 by Jancopes (talk | contribs)
Completed

Click Here To Edit

140 THE EXAMINER.-----
for so doing. These are my terms, from none of which I can recede.—
Sir Thomas Monro: Life, by Mr. Gleig.

Ballot at Rome.— Cicero remarks, that the grand struggle at Rome,
under the Republic, was to prevent the will of the majority from taking
effect "ne plurimum valeant plurimi," de Re P. The venality and
corruption, however, which were carried on at the elections, and the
inefficiency of the Treating Acts (leges de ambitu) became so apparent, that
Gabinius Tr. Pl. introduced, A. U. 614, the lex tabellaria, by which the
elections to the magistracy were to be made by Ballot. By this law each
elector received a wooden tablet (tabella) covered with wax, upon which
he wrote the name of the candidate he preferred; at the time of voting he
passed through a narrow passage (pons) boarded up on each side to
exclude observation, and placed the tablet in a large box. The box was
afterwards opened by Examiners appointed for the purpose, and the number
of votes for each candidate was pricked off. Hence Horace's
expression, "omne tulit punctum," to express universal approbation. Voting
by Ballot became so popular with the electors, enabling them to adopt, as
Cicero remarks, pro Plancio, "the free exercise of opinion, with an
undaunted brow," that it was soon extended to the judgments issuing from
the popular jurisdiction, and to the enactment or rejection of laws. How
long these laws continued in force does not appear in Adam, Heineccius,
&c., nor do these writers appear to have been aware that they must have
been repealed. This clearly appears to have been the case, however,
from a letter of the younger Pliny, 1. 3, ep. 20, in which he describes the
re-enactment of the law of Ballot. It was in the interval between the
repeal and re-enactment that corruption and bribery again raised their
heads and called forth the complaint of Petronius—"Venalis populus
venalis curia partum." In the above quoted letter of Pliny, he remarks
that although the conduct at elections was such as absolutely to require
the Ballot, he deplored the necessity, as he feared that great evils would
flow from its use. In a subsequent letter, 1. 4, ep. 25, he states that these
fears had been realised, and the practical evils he describes will no doubt
amuse the advocates for the theory of Ballot—he complains that many of
the electors not sufficiently awed by the august majesty of the senate,
wrote all kinds of jokes and smut on the tablets—nay, one even wrote the
names of the canvasser, instead of the candidates. The most interesting
discussion on the Ballot, however, is to be found in Cicero de Leg.,
where in laying down the laws for his commonwealth, he declares that the
votes shall be "optimalibus nota, plebe libera;" and on Atticus contesting
the point as an aristocrat, hating, as he confesses every popular institution,
Cicero opens up the argument and concludes, "habeat sane populous tabellam,
quasi vindicem libertatis"—the people must have the Ballot as
guarantee for their liberties. Popular elections, therefore, at Rome produced
exactly the same effect as in England—corruption—acts to prevent bribery
—corruption unabated—and, as a remedy in each, a unanimous demand
for the Ballot from the middle ranks. We have noted, in a previous
number, that both Hume and Harrington insist upon the Ballot as a sine
quâ non for obtaining virtual representation. Sir Thomas More expresses
himself with equal clearness upon the subject; and in all governments in
which the unbiassed choice of the electors has been sought, Ballotation has
ever been in use. The word Ballot (little ball) comes immediately from
balota, a word "mediæ Latinitatis," an example of which is given in
Ducange; it may be traced, however, in most of the European languages.
See Webster.




Identifier: | JB/004/070/012"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 4.

Date_1

1831-02-27

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

004

Main Headings

lord brougham displayed

Folio number

070

Info in main headings field

Image

012

Titles

the examiner / sunday, february 27, 1831 / no. 1204

Category

printed material

Number of Pages

8

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

(130-144)

Penner

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

jeremy bentham

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

[[notes_public::"john fonblanques eulogium on brougham" [note in bentham's hand]]]

ID Number

1991

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in