<span class="mw-page-title-main">JB/050/007/001</span>

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/050/007/001

Revision as of 11:55, 26 July 2018 by Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
Completed

Click Here To Edit

PROCEDURE SUMMARY III

CONSTABLE in case of his disobedience refusal to
power of commiting him at short hand — exst at
Specialing 43 7.

CERTICRAKL taken away 7.G.3
1st Absolutely
Security
Bond a
Condition of the security
optional

2. Conditionally 3. §§.6.5 G.35 §§ nisi upon unless Bond be given
with for the & costs or to the
Deft)
Firm)
guard) 1 Month it.
Praestandum( Alternative at
( supra
(Positive pay</add. for the
( Forfeiture & Costs
( .
Again ( Generally in all as in
either ( Before Conviction G.3. <add>(§§9)

APPEAL from Conviction VIEW + v. IV.

+ View not traversable
"gainsayable" said
parenthetically in + S Law
522.

Appeal in this case seems not to have been thought
of; tho' this be the case of all others and to it is
most necessary to be admitted
yet this being the proceeding
of all others the most summary, The liberty of Appeal it seems
more necessary to admitt of it this cases.

of all cases in which
the liberty of appeal
may seem necessary
this seems to be that
in which it is most
so.

<add>In the 1st place It is admissible or no? this is a question which the
words of the act where it treats of appeals paid
no lightfor deciding any farther than from
their generality, the inference from which is not always to be depended
upon.

<foreign> Defideratur speciation
in 9. An.
23 §§22.

EVIDENCE — Parties examinable on compellable oath.

In all matters merely civil ( between party & party)
power might be committed to the Magistrate of
the parties may be examining the parties themselves
upon Oath not only safely but consistently
with the dispositions practise of the Law in other occasions —
As in the Court of Chancery & the
Court of Conscience.

For it will hardly be said, that a Justice of
the peace is less competent fit to be entrusted with such
worse qualified for the exercise
of such a
power

than the an Examiner of the Court of Chancery
or a couple of Attornies dubbed Commissioners
for the occasion — still less than the Commissioners those Tradesmen
of whom [the quorum of Commissioners]
a Court of Conscience is ordinarily composed.

Nor again will it be said, that there is lots more harm
in putting where the matter at stake is confined limited to a few pounds
where at a stroke
in cases where it ordinarily frequently amounts to many
thousands and amount to any still greater sum that
can be named.

This power for instance is granted under the 9. An. 23 §§22
which empowers a Justice to render satisfaction

EVIDENCE
Party's compellable

Supposing it to be admissible, in the next place
how are the proceedings to be conducted? a question
the difficulty answers to which may contribute to forma
presumption that the former question one was never
seriously proposed.

unconcerned Witnesses there are none — the only parties necessarily present (unless
by accident) are the delinquent & the Magistrate —
Whence then can is there any account of the
transaction to come? from those parties, & from them
alone if from any. But what power is there any where
given to take this examination? then upon oath not any time
What power of compelling them to submitt to it
As little. What Law which makes such evidence
competent even if given? Mot any none at all

But I have gone too far <add.by the</add> supposing that the
matter can ever arrive at6 this stage
in arguing as if it
could ever get so far

I speak hitherto up[on the general principles
of evidence: but whether or no the argument
ex necessitate rei might not here, as in
the case of an Action for the money robbed
against the County, dispense with those principles
to admitt the evidence if the party
is what I would not take upon me to

Takinga way the incompetency from the party
grieved will not be sufficient for the purpose of
justice — The restoration of competency might
to be reciprocal — which it is, by the p
of examining both.

<head> EVIDENCE<head>

Power of admitting accomplices
in an offence — in a Justice with
consent of the Informer — extat nullibo
seio.
Guard against abrasive by a declaration
upon Oath on the part of the Magistrate of the Accomplices having been admitted as
defective evidentureTho' indeed at any rate there will be
one at least punishment

ACCOMPLICES specified 7. Dr

Wood 9c v.

ACCOMPLICES Acco ..

INSTRUMENTS
PERSONA
ACCESSORIA innocents tutoe

Screened + viz. Accessores
ab incolnsulto
— No
this won't do. for the
infection is present.
the case comes under
that of Exemption
by reason of ignorance.
by a protection
clause — where there was is a colour of Title
the instigator, either infected from his apparent <gap/.
or announced by add>his</add> positive assurances, and as
a Tenant cutting Timber — Qu. ubi?
Desideratatur-retur and 6.G.3.48. Wood cutting
the general words, Tenants were deemed to be
composited</p.

PROCEDURE.
SUMMARY —
Evidence.



Identifier: | JB/050/007/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 50.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

050

Main Headings

procedure code

Folio number

007

Info in main headings field

procedure summary iii

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

2

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::gr [crown motif] [lion with vryheyt motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

15998

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in