JB/011/139/001

Click Here To Edit

1823 Aug. 10.
Reformists reviewed.

Peel.

1
Peel willdo nothing
against without the Judges
Judges nothing against
their own interest and
prejudice</note>

Peel. Brougham foils to J.B.? (1)

When one sees the production of Mr Gill not will
to which part of his form his intellectual or like — the -quacking pest

In regard to hopes for Mr Peel the matter closed
there. Mr Peel will not bring forward any thing that is not approved
of by the Judges: the Judges will not approve
of any thing that runs contra to their won interest and -begotten
and begotten prejudices: and nothing that
of stature is good and now nothing is there that as we
admire to those same adverse interests

2
No intellect for judging
of his own accord whatever
intellect he had,
by Alma Mater

How much He sits in the lap of these wto Nurses,
how should he do otherwise. This judging on they in
its own no does he possess. Whatsoever
intellect nature gives him as and resident
rickety in this perjury — growing nursing soil of the Alum men

If a source presents a tolerably instructive
has much more instruction the i
magistri! At his back for every into the published word, he
person as in the from the days of Lord Eldon which better
could have been expected from him?

Identifier: | JB/011/139/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 11.
Date_1	1829-08-10	Marginal Summary Numbering	1-3
Box	011	Main Headings	law amendment
Folio number	139	Info in main headings field	reformists reviewed
Image	001	Titles
Category	text sheet	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	c1
Penner	jeremy bentham	Watermarks	b&m 1829
Marginals		Paper Producer	arthur moore; richard doane
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year	1829
Notes public		ID Number	3836
Box Contents