JB/157/038/002

Click Here To Edit

I 1. Condition
1. Conclusion

paysac
II II. Right
II. Condition . . .

point of might
III Advantages
III III Improvements
III. Condition - improvement
it
would receive

V IV Hardship
IV. No more hardship
but a
contra

V V. Consent
V. Consent not

VI - not to be
expected

VIII therefore best
not to be applied
for

VI Square Act

VIIII Opposition on
stronger ground
was over ruled in
the Square Act

VII Only Chance

IX. This the only
chance for improvement

Mode of Execution
- must be
independent of repugnants -

---page break---

I Condition

I

Quantity - Poor
House included
p.1

2

Condition - in respect
of value of
the Herbage. p.1

3

2- and multitude
of the Commoners
p.3.

4

3. - harbour afforded
for seditious
assemblies.
p.3.

5

5

4 -multitude of
public buildings
of the manner cast
in the immediate
neighbourhood. p..5

---page break---

III Advantages

6

The Penitentiary
House would afford
a positive security
against malefactors,
besides the negative
one. p.7.

7

No spot can be
freer from objection i
n the Score
of the pretium
affectionis. p.7.

8

Except in the instance
of the Paupers,
whose affections
should give
way tot he good of
the public which
supports them. p.7.

9

In these very Parishes
incomparably greater liberties
were taken
with the pretium
affectionis
in the case of the
Deans Yard Square
Act. p.9.

10

The opposers of that
Act, in their remonstrances
against
the powers thereby
created admitt the
propriety of such creation
in a case like
the present. p.11

11

That Act was found
by high authority &
after great consideration.
p.11

---page break---