JB/072/132/002

Click Here To Edit

18
Personal Injuries

of being beaten by the aggressor and questino, given the
motive which he had for beating his adversary, subsisted
not with regard to them. But subsist suppose
it to have subsisted ever so, still so long as
there is this circumstance of consent in the case,
they have nothing to fear. By teh supposition it is
only in case of conent tha tthe author of
is disposed to beat any body. Now to give consent
or not is (for I speak not of a
which for such a purpose is none) is in the party's
own power. It is his own act, the expression of his
own [will] volition. Now that which cannot happen
without his will should a man, can scarcely
have any fears about.

Consent is looked upon as nothing.
The case is, that whether there has been consent or no consent,
the physical appearance
is still the same and this
is all which the Judges who have established the
Law in this behalf
doctrine to have attended to.
In the case of Matthew and Ollerton it
was held that if a man another to beat him
such license is void. The reason given is, that this
is against the Peace. Against the Peace? against
whose peace? against the peace of the man who
chose to be beat or against the peace of strangers
who have nothing no concern in the affair. The same reason
what

Identifier: | JB/072/132/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 72.
Date_1		Marginal Summary Numbering	not numbered
Box	072	Main Headings	penal code
Folio number	132	Info in main headings field	personal injuries
Image	002	Titles	exemptive circumstances - consent
Category	text sheet	Number of Pages	4
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	e17 / e18 / / e20
Penner	jeremy bentham	Watermarks	[[watermarks::[gr with crown motif] pro patria [with motif]]]
Marginals	jeremy bentham	Paper Producer
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year
Notes public		ID Number	23749
Box Contents