JB/137/112/001

Click Here To Edit

1819 Nov. 23 II. Nature of the case Radicalism not 2 § 3.III Moveables 1. Among moveables, let us begin with such articles of To begin with such immoveable restating of which the 26
1. For exempt
articles of value
independent of
fancy — husbandry
&c stock.
No article exceeding
the value of an equal
sharelot could find a
purchaser possessor
nor therefore a
purchaser.
those sorts, of which the value is most compleatly entrance and independent of fancy.
Stock of all in all shapes: husbandry stock; fting
stocks mining stock, for a fishing stocks, manufacturing stock, shipping
stock, equipments<add>furniture:</add>. he ships navigable vessels themselves included or not included. he article the value of which exceeds the value
of the that of call mans sha in the
of the equal lot or rather of the moveable portion of it, if it
aggregate property in both shapes can consistently, with the supposition
remain in the hand of any one: either than it
must be taken at a value less than that of an entire
lot as just described, or it must be destroyed, or it may
what comes to the same thing it must remain unoccupied. 27
Ex gr. No article
in husbandry
on a seat exceeding
Cottage &c
or spade husbandry.
Barns,
granary
stable &c.
& of horses would
be to to be eating,
the equalaverage lot
not affording where
withal to keep it.
Such the value of a
horse now worth
£2,000 for breeding
, hay Of all farms the of such size that their
husbandry exceeds what is called Cottage husbandry the
stock must be divided: the barns, granaries,stablesin which it
is housed, with this except, if any thing, except if a small corner of each
useless be valueless became useless. Oxen> | Cows Oxen, Sheep
and Swine Pigs will return for a time their value, because they
may at any time be killed and eaten. Horses will have
not reurn their value for altogether<add>the only </add> unless they they to be too should be used as an
article of food, which, with regard to such of them as remained alive, would
infallibly be the case: for, in addition to what would be
necessary for immediate subsistence, no mans lot would
include what is necessary for the maintenance of a
horse. A horse bought other day at the price of £1,000 or £2,000
would not indeed lose all his value: for he would retain that be another what
which he would for food possess as an article of food he would be worth value:: but he would replace be worth no individuals would
be to be collided for
the purpose of receiving
each their lot: and
since will be a four
-footed beast can not
as a poly does. live after being out to pieces, what as to be clear with the remainders resulting from the division of the number of each sort of article by the number of
the sharers as altogether what where as between one lot and another, the numbers of the cattle in question are the same, as between and sharer [+]

places and times 28
Terms and plans for
the division what?
ill remainder would
be to be destroyed or
consumed at the time
as sale would, as
above be impossible.

Identifier: | JB/137/112/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 137.
Date_1	1819-11-23	Marginal Summary Numbering	26-28
Box	137	Main Headings	radicalism not dangerous
Folio number	112	Info in main headings field	radicalism not
Image	001	Titles
Category	text sheet	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	e2
Penner	jeremy bentham	Watermarks	[[watermarks::[prince of wales feathers] i&m 1816]]
Marginals	jeremy bentham	Paper Producer	arthur wellesley, duke of wellington
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year	1816
Notes public		ID Number	46829
Box Contents