JB/122/186/001

'Click Here To Edit

12 July 1808 + Answer
Query 3
(8

The extract in question is an a written assertion declaration,
made by the manufacturers in question, and declaring that the goods
mentioned in it were sent as mentioned. The What
Mr Chief Inspector lays so much stress upon under the
name of an original Invoice can not have amounted
to more, and may very well have not amounted
to so much. If (for example) the goods
in question were sent (as I believe was the case) either
by sea or by an inland and comparatively long
Carriage by consuls, the Invoice, with a letter of
advice, might very well have been sent by post;
and come greatly if the goods either as being dispatched <add>Sent, or as being about to be dispatched sent:
and consequently in which same case it might have happened
to the goods not never to have arrived at all, not so
much as to have been sent.

Identifier: | JB/122/186/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 122.
Date_1	1808-07-12	Marginal Summary Numbering
Box	122	Main Headings	Panopticon
Folio number	186	Info in main headings field
Image	001	Titles
Category	Text sheet	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	Recto"Recto" is not in the list (recto, verso) of allowed values for the "Rectoverso" property.	Page Numbering	E8
Penner		Watermarks
Marginals		Paper Producer
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year
Notes public		ID Number	001
Box Contents